Discussion:
People dying on the street in India
(too old to reply)
The Greenwood is Magic
2010-11-06 05:33:15 UTC
Permalink
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and stay
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area into
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through a
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.

In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewalk.
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pain
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation I
tried to do what I could do...buying a meal, giving water and money.
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.

Loading Image...

...she'd just been given a meal and 500 rupees.

India is quite frankly a loony bin of a place. The Aryans invaded X
years ago (thousands years?), and incorporated indigenous Dravidian/
folk religions into the new order - The Brahamic Hindu caste system
order...with fair skin, the skin colour of the Aryan invaders, being
seen as 'high caste'. The Dravidans with their dark skin were
relegated to 'low caste' by the Aryans. Tribal people were completely
excluded from this racist ritual abuse senario. The position in
society/caste, being touted by the ritual abuse sytem as 'ones karma'
by the Aryan Brahmic priest order, and if you were a good citizen type
thing, you might get reborn next time in a higher cast (with fairer
skin)....I mean isn't that just so f'ing evil! Watch those Aryan's -
very very dodgy. (a sicko senario now worth $1 billion a year in skin
lightening creams). Now many tribals in India are being more or less
summilarily evicted from their lands (that means millions of real
people) in order that the new India can make economic progress....and
many end up homeless and hungry on the streets on Indian cities with
these so called high castes walking by them saying "oh its their karma
that they're starving on the street"!!! The so called high castes in
India get all or most of the advantages and breaks and money. The
Hindu caste system is very much entrenched in India, and very much to
do I think, with the massive corruption in The Indian political and
economic system...the 'high castes' think that they can do whatever
the f'k they want regardless of legal statute etc etc - much like the
old school blightyworld aristocracy.

And these scum ignore dying human beings with a dismissive "its their
karma"

By the way, I did not see the same scenes of horror on the streets of
democratic socialist Kerala state...but over the border in Tamil Nadu,
there were people dying and sick being ignored by individuals and the
state/government.

Please do what you to help the real needy folks like this...just
imagine being in this situation...starving, in pain, no one to help
you...

Bles

Jim

MAKAH TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY!

;)
The Greenwood is Magic
2010-11-06 06:06:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and stay
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area into
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through a
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewalk.
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pain
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation I
tried to do what I could do...buying  a meal, giving water and money.
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
http://www.indiamike.com/india/attachments/15190d1288952639-how-to-de...
...she'd just been given a meal and 500 rupees.
India is quite frankly a loony bin of a place. The Aryans invaded X
years ago (thousands years?), and incorporated indigenous Dravidian/
folk religions into the new order - The Brahamic Hindu caste system
order...with fair skin, the skin colour of the Aryan invaders, being
seen as 'high caste'. The Dravidans with their dark skin were
relegated to 'low caste' by the Aryans. Tribal people were completely
excluded from this racist ritual abuse senario. The position in
society/caste, being touted by the ritual abuse sytem as 'ones karma'
by the Aryan Brahmic priest order, and if you were a good citizen type
thing, you might get reborn next time in a higher cast (with fairer
skin)....I mean isn't that just so f'ing evil! Watch those Aryan's -
very very dodgy. (a sicko senario now worth $1 billion a year in skin
lightening creams). Now many tribals in India are being more or less
summilarily evicted from their lands (that means millions of real
people) in order that the new India can make economic progress....and
many end up homeless and hungry on the streets on Indian cities with
these so called high castes walking by them saying "oh its their karma
that they're starving on the street"!!! The so called high castes in
India get all or most of the advantages and breaks and money. The
Hindu caste system is very much entrenched in India, and very much to
do I think, with the massive corruption in The Indian political and
economic system...the 'high castes' think that they can do whatever
the f'k they want regardless of legal statute etc etc - much like the
old school blightyworld aristocracy.
And these scum ignore dying human beings with a dismissive "its their
karma"
By the way, I did not see the same scenes of horror on the streets of
democratic socialist Kerala state...but over the border in Tamil Nadu,
there were people dying and sick being ignored by individuals and the
state/government.
Please do what you to help the real needy folks like this...just
imagine being in this situation...starving, in pain, no one to help
you...
Bles
Jim
MAKAH TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY!
;)


Blessings
Frito Pendejo
2010-11-06 06:38:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and stay
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area into
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through a
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewalk.
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pain
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation I
tried to do what I could do...buying a meal, giving water and money.
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help? I thought Chairman Obama promised free food for everyone.
The Greenwood is Magic
2010-11-06 07:16:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and stay
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area into
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through a
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewalk.
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pain
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation I
tried to do what I could do...buying  a meal, giving water and money.
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help?  I thought Chairman Obama promised free food for everyone.
Cunt
walt tonne
2010-11-06 13:39:31 UTC
Permalink
Too many Indians. They should enforce strict birth control like China.
Or let
Mother Nature take her course. No food shipments, keeps 'em alive to
breed even more!
Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
2010-11-06 13:45:38 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and stay
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area into
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through a
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewalk.
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pain
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation I
tried to do what I could do...buying =A0a meal, giving water and money.
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help? =A0I thought Chairman Obama promised free food for eve=
ryone.
Cunt
That's right. Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his trip
to India.

That would feed quite a few dotheads.
spiritrising
2010-11-06 15:24:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and stay
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area into
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through a
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewalk.
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pain
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation I
tried to do what I could do...buying =A0a meal, giving water and money.
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help? =A0I thought Chairman Obama promised free food for eve=
ryone.
Cunt
That's right.  Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his trip
to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
2010-11-06 15:42:43 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT), spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and st=
ay
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area in=
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through =
a
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewal=
k.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pa=
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation=
I
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
tried to do what I could do...buying =3DA0a meal, giving water and m=
oney.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help? =3DA0I thought Chairman Obama promised free food fo=
r eve=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
ryone.
Cunt
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his trip
to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.
r***@yahoo.com
2010-11-06 16:28:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT), spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and st=
ay
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area in=
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through =
a
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewal=
k.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pa=
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation=
I
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
tried to do what I could do...buying =3DA0a meal, giving water and m=
oney.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help? =3DA0I thought Chairman Obama promised free food fo=
r eve=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
ryone.
Cunt
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his trip
to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.  You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
crawl back under your rock crossposting asswipes
Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
2010-11-06 16:33:44 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:28:56 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT), spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going=
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and=
st=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
ay
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area=
in=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacia=
l
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains=
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aiml=
ess
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got throu=
gh =3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
a
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was a=
n
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the side=
wal=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
k.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and=
pa=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situat=
ion=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
I
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
tried to do what I could do...buying =3D3DA0a meal, giving water =
and m=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
oney.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help? =3D3DA0I thought Chairman Obama promised free fo=
od fo=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
r eve=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
ryone.
Cunt
That's right. =3DA0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his t=
rip
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. =A0You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
crawl back under your rock crossposting asswipes
The bleeding heart, redistribution-of-wealth moonbat who started this
thread crossposted, ya dumb cunt.

I'm just responding.
r***@yahoo.com
2010-11-07 02:06:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:28:56 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT), spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going=
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and=
st=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
ay
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area=
in=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacia=
l
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains=
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aiml=
ess
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got throu=
gh =3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
a
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was a=
n
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the side=
wal=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
k.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and=
pa=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situat=
ion=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
I
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
tried to do what I could do...buying =3D3DA0a meal, giving water =
and m=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
oney.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
Why should I help? =3D3DA0I thought Chairman Obama promised free fo=
od fo=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
r eve=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
ryone.
Cunt
That's right. =3DA0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his t=
rip
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. =A0You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
crawl back under your rock crossposting asswipes
The bleeding heart, redistribution-of-wealth moonbat who started this
thread crossposted, ya dumb cunt.
I'm just responding.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
bite me you reactionary fasist asshole
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 02:09:10 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:06:30 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:28:56 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT), spiritrising
ls
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally go=
ing=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking =
and=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
st=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
ay
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalay=
an
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the a=
rea=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
in=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone gla=
cia=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
l
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to =
the
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking arou=
nd
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mounta=
ins=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly a=
iml=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
ess
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got th=
rou=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
gh =3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
a
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that wa=
s a=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
n
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the s=
ide=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
wal=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
k.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation =
and=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
pa=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respe=
ct.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people =
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes eve=
n
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate sit=
uat=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
ion=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
I
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
tried to do what I could do...buying =3D3D3DA0a meal, giving w=
ater =3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
and m=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
oney.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this=
.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Why should I help? =3D3D3DA0I thought Chairman Obama promised fr=
ee fo=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
od fo=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
r eve=3D3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
ryone.
Cunt
That's right. =3D3DA0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on =
his t=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
rip
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. =3DA=
0You
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
crawl back under your rock crossposting asswipes
The bleeding heart, redistribution-of-wealth moonbat who started this
thread crossposted, ya dumb cunt.
I'm just responding.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
bite me you reactionary fasist asshole
Eat shit and die you socialist cunt.
r***@yahoo.com
2010-11-07 02:14:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:06:30 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:28:56 -0700 (PDT),
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT), spiritrising
ls
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), The Greenwood is Magic
Post by Frito Pendejo
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally go=
ing=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking =
and=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
st=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
ay
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalay=
an
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the a=
rea=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
in=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone gla=
cia=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
l
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to =
the
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking arou=
nd
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mounta=
ins=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
to
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly a=
iml=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
ess
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got th=
rou=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
gh =3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
a
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that wa=
s a=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
n
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the s=
ide=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
wal=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
k.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation =
and=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
pa=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respe=
ct.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people =
in
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes eve=
n
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate sit=
uat=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
ion=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
I
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
tried to do what I could do...buying =3D3D3DA0a meal, giving w=
ater =3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
and m=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
oney.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this=
.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
Why should I help? =3D3D3DA0I thought Chairman Obama promised fr=
ee fo=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
od fo=3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
r eve=3D3D3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Frito Pendejo
ryone.
Cunt
That's right. =3D3DA0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on =
his t=3D
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
rip
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. =3DA=
0You
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
crawl back under your rock crossposting asswipes
The bleeding heart, redistribution-of-wealth moonbat who started this
thread crossposted, ya dumb cunt.
I'm just responding.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
bite me you  reactionary fasist asshole
Eat shit and die you socialist cunt.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
you fucking reactionaries cant even get gender right...LOLOLOL....me
a socialist....what a laugh.... your an ignorant idiot...who resorts
to insults because you cant formulate a reasonable argument....LOLOL
zayton
2010-11-07 02:31:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by r***@yahoo.com
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
I'm just responding.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
bite me you reactionary fasist asshole
You might want to rethink that; those rabes shots hurt!
zayton
2010-11-06 22:13:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his
trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
2010-11-06 22:19:24 UTC
Permalink
Another moonbat cunt in need of education:

It’s Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey



- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department. It
only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to add
$3 trillion to the federal debt.

The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury
Department, is now $13.666 trillion.

Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department’s Bureau
of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount—to the penny--of total
federal debt as of the close of the previous business day.

At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday’s business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96—an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama’s inauguration.

As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal debt
includes two major components: debt held by the public, which includes
publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.

The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the debt
under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the public
as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the public has
increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated, according to
the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal debt has increased
287.0889 billion.
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his
trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
2010-11-06 22:25:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
It’s Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department. It
only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to add
$3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury
Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department’s Bureau
of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount—to the penny--of total
federal debt as of the close of the previous business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday’s business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96—an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama’s inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal debt
includes two major components: debt held by the public, which includes
publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the debt
under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the public
as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the public has
increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated, according to
the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal debt has increased
287.0889 billion.
And

Michelle Obama's Spanish vacation draws critics
As the president preaches frugality in lean economic times, his wife
and youngest daughter are vacationing at a luxury resort outside
Marbella. Officials say the Obamas will pay for personal expenses.
August 06, 2010|By Peter Nicholas and Katherine Skiba, Tribune
Washington BureauReporting from Washington — As the economy endures
high unemployment and a jittery stock market, President Obama has
preached sacrifice and fiscal discipline. But the pictures coming out
of a sun-splashed Spanish resort this week may be sending a different
message.

First Lady Michelle Obama is in the midst of a five-day trip to a
luxury resort along with a few friends, her youngest daughter, aides
and Secret Service personnel. Her office said the family will pay for
personal expenses, but won't reveal the taxpayer cost for the
government employees.

Elected officials — Democrats and Republicans — were reluctant to
weigh in, not wanting to appear critical of the president's wife. But
the trip provided plenty of fodder for television news anchors,
talk-show hosts and bloggers.

Critics portrayed the foreign getaway as tone-deaf to the deep
economic anxiety back home. Earlier in the week, the first lady was
photographed walking through the streets of the Costa del Sol region
wearing a one-shouldered Jean Paul Gaultier top.

Every first family takes vacations. The criticism aimed at Michelle
Obama is that she chose to visit a foreign country rather than remain
in the U.S. and support its fragile economy.

Last month the first lady flew to the Florida Panhandle, a tourist
draw hit hard by the oil spill crisis, and delivered the message that
for parents "looking for things to do with their kids this summer …
this is a wonderful place to visit."

The opulence of the European trip also has drawn scrutiny. The
president has urged frugality in lean economic times. He once
cautioned that families saving money for college shouldn't "blow a
bunch of cash in Vegas."

Michelle Obama is staying at the Hotel Villa Padierna, a Ritz-Carlton
resort in the mountains outside Marbella. The resort boasts two golf
courses, a posh spa with Turkish baths, views of the Mediterranean Sea
and a high-end restaurant specializing in avant-garde fare. Room rates
start at $400 and rise to $6,500 for a two-bedroom villa with a
private pool and 24-hour butler service.

The danger for the Obamas is that the trip may feed perceptions that
they are elites, out of touch with struggling American families, said
Chris Wilson, a Republican pollster.

"This in and of itself doesn't hurt President Obama, but it plants a
seed in voters' minds that she's not like me, that they're not like
me," he said.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his
trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat. You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
zayton
2010-11-06 23:53:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department.
It only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to add
$3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury
Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's Bureau
of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the penny--of total
federal debt as of the close of the previous business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday's business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal
debt includes two major components: debt held by the public, which
includes publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the debt
under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the public
as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the public has
increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated, according to
the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal debt has increased
287.0889 billion.
And
Michelle Obama's Spanish vacation draws critics
As the president preaches frugality in lean economic times, his wife
and youngest daughter are vacationing at a luxury resort outside
Marbella.
Officials say the Obamas will pay for personal expenses.
August 06, 2010|By Peter Nicholas and Katherine Skiba, Tribune
Washington BureauReporting from Washington - As the economy endures
high unemployment and a jittery stock market, President Obama has
preached sacrifice and fiscal discipline. But the pictures coming out
of a sun-splashed Spanish resort this week may be sending a different
message.
How so?
According to the line I have isolated above; they are paying their own
expenses.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
First Lady Michelle Obama is in the midst of a five-day trip to a
luxury resort along with a few friends, her youngest daughter, aides
and Secret Service personnel. Her office said the family will pay for
personal expenses, but won't reveal the taxpayer cost for the
government employees.
Elected officials - Democrats and Republicans - were reluctant to
weigh in, not wanting to appear critical of the president's wife. But
the trip provided plenty of fodder for television news anchors,
talk-show hosts and bloggers.
Critics portrayed the foreign getaway as tone-deaf to the deep
economic anxiety back home. Earlier in the week, the first lady was
photographed walking through the streets of the Costa del Sol region
wearing a one-shouldered Jean Paul Gaultier top.
Every first family takes vacations. The criticism aimed at Michelle
Obama is that she chose to visit a foreign country rather than remain
in the U.S. and support its fragile economy.
Last month the first lady flew to the Florida Panhandle, a tourist
draw hit hard by the oil spill crisis, and delivered the message that
for parents "looking for things to do with their kids this summer .
this is a wonderful place to visit."
The opulence of the European trip also has drawn scrutiny. The
president has urged frugality in lean economic times. He once
cautioned that families saving money for college shouldn't "blow a
bunch of cash in Vegas."
Michelle Obama is staying at the Hotel Villa Padierna, a Ritz-Carlton
resort in the mountains outside Marbella. The resort boasts two golf
courses, a posh spa with Turkish baths, views of the Mediterranean Sea
and a high-end restaurant specializing in avant-garde fare. Room rates
start at $400 and rise to $6,500 for a two-bedroom villa with a
private pool and 24-hour butler service.
The danger for the Obamas is that the trip may feed perceptions that
they are elites, out of touch with struggling American families, said
Chris Wilson, a Republican pollster.
"This in and of itself doesn't hurt President Obama, but it plants a
seed in voters' minds that she's not like me, that they're not like
me," he said.
At least that is the seed your propaganda would like to plant.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on
his trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe
you, but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of
course the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the
deficit and it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de
eagle fly even during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 01:58:11 UTC
Permalink
What line did you isolate?

Absence of a refutation noted.
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department.
It only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to add
$3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury
Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's Bureau
of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the penny--of total
federal debt as of the close of the previous business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday's business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal
debt includes two major components: debt held by the public, which
includes publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the debt
under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the public
as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the public has
increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated, according to
the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal debt has increased
287.0889 billion.
And
Michelle Obama's Spanish vacation draws critics
As the president preaches frugality in lean economic times, his wife
and youngest daughter are vacationing at a luxury resort outside
Marbella.
Officials say the Obamas will pay for personal expenses.
August 06, 2010|By Peter Nicholas and Katherine Skiba, Tribune
Washington BureauReporting from Washington - As the economy endures
high unemployment and a jittery stock market, President Obama has
preached sacrifice and fiscal discipline. But the pictures coming out
of a sun-splashed Spanish resort this week may be sending a different
message.
How so?
According to the line I have isolated above; they are paying their own
expenses.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
First Lady Michelle Obama is in the midst of a five-day trip to a
luxury resort along with a few friends, her youngest daughter, aides
and Secret Service personnel. Her office said the family will pay for
personal expenses, but won't reveal the taxpayer cost for the
government employees.
Elected officials - Democrats and Republicans - were reluctant to
weigh in, not wanting to appear critical of the president's wife. But
the trip provided plenty of fodder for television news anchors,
talk-show hosts and bloggers.
Critics portrayed the foreign getaway as tone-deaf to the deep
economic anxiety back home. Earlier in the week, the first lady was
photographed walking through the streets of the Costa del Sol region
wearing a one-shouldered Jean Paul Gaultier top.
Every first family takes vacations. The criticism aimed at Michelle
Obama is that she chose to visit a foreign country rather than remain
in the U.S. and support its fragile economy.
Last month the first lady flew to the Florida Panhandle, a tourist
draw hit hard by the oil spill crisis, and delivered the message that
for parents "looking for things to do with their kids this summer .
this is a wonderful place to visit."
The opulence of the European trip also has drawn scrutiny. The
president has urged frugality in lean economic times. He once
cautioned that families saving money for college shouldn't "blow a
bunch of cash in Vegas."
Michelle Obama is staying at the Hotel Villa Padierna, a Ritz-Carlton
resort in the mountains outside Marbella. The resort boasts two golf
courses, a posh spa with Turkish baths, views of the Mediterranean Sea
and a high-end restaurant specializing in avant-garde fare. Room rates
start at $400 and rise to $6,500 for a two-bedroom villa with a
private pool and 24-hour butler service.
The danger for the Obamas is that the trip may feed perceptions that
they are elites, out of touch with struggling American families, said
Chris Wilson, a Republican pollster.
"This in and of itself doesn't hurt President Obama, but it plants a
seed in voters' minds that she's not like me, that they're not like
me," he said.
At least that is the seed your propaganda would like to plant.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on
his trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe
you, but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of
course the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the
deficit and it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de
eagle fly even during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
zayton
2010-11-07 02:29:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
What line did you isolate?
Absence of a refutation noted.
The one that now has

blank space


above and below it..
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department.
It only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to
add $3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the
Treasury Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's
Bureau of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the
penny--of total federal debt as of the close of the previous
business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was
$10,626,877,048,913.08. On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government
borrowed an additional $58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total
federal debt at the close of Friday's business day to
$13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of $3,039,049,594,342.88 since
President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal
debt includes two major components: debt held by the public, which
includes publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the
debt under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by
the public as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the
public has increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was
inaugurated, according to the Bureau of Public Debt, while
intragovernmnetal debt has increased 287.0889 billion.
And
Michelle Obama's Spanish vacation draws critics
As the president preaches frugality in lean economic times, his wife
and youngest daughter are vacationing at a luxury resort outside
Marbella.
Officials say the Obamas will pay for personal expenses.
August 06, 2010|By Peter Nicholas and Katherine Skiba, Tribune
Washington BureauReporting from Washington - As the economy endures
high unemployment and a jittery stock market, President Obama has
preached sacrifice and fiscal discipline. But the pictures coming
out of a sun-splashed Spanish resort this week may be sending a
different message.
How so?
According to the line I have isolated above; they are paying their
own expenses.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
First Lady Michelle Obama is in the midst of a five-day trip to a
luxury resort along with a few friends, her youngest daughter, aides
and Secret Service personnel. Her office said the family will pay
for personal expenses, but won't reveal the taxpayer cost for the
government employees.
Elected officials - Democrats and Republicans - were reluctant to
weigh in, not wanting to appear critical of the president's wife.
But the trip provided plenty of fodder for television news anchors,
talk-show hosts and bloggers.
Critics portrayed the foreign getaway as tone-deaf to the deep
economic anxiety back home. Earlier in the week, the first lady was
photographed walking through the streets of the Costa del Sol region
wearing a one-shouldered Jean Paul Gaultier top.
Every first family takes vacations. The criticism aimed at Michelle
Obama is that she chose to visit a foreign country rather than
remain in the U.S. and support its fragile economy.
Last month the first lady flew to the Florida Panhandle, a tourist
draw hit hard by the oil spill crisis, and delivered the message
that for parents "looking for things to do with their kids this
summer . this is a wonderful place to visit."
The opulence of the European trip also has drawn scrutiny. The
president has urged frugality in lean economic times. He once
cautioned that families saving money for college shouldn't "blow a
bunch of cash in Vegas."
Michelle Obama is staying at the Hotel Villa Padierna, a
Ritz-Carlton resort in the mountains outside Marbella. The resort
boasts two golf courses, a posh spa with Turkish baths, views of
the Mediterranean Sea and a high-end restaurant specializing in
avant-garde fare. Room rates start at $400 and rise to $6,500 for a
two-bedroom villa with a private pool and 24-hour butler service.
The danger for the Obamas is that the trip may feed perceptions that
they are elites, out of touch with struggling American families,
said Chris Wilson, a Republican pollster.
"This in and of itself doesn't hurt President Obama, but it plants a
seed in voters' minds that she's not like me, that they're not like
me," he said.
At least that is the seed your propaganda would like to plant.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:13:04 -0500, "zayton"
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on
his trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe
you, but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of
course the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the
deficit and it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de
eagle fly even during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 03:37:11 UTC
Permalink
It seems implausible that a President of the United States could
actually be doing harm to the economy by design, but that appears to
be the case. Despite what the media lapdogs, Obama apologists say, the
economy is “contracting”. It just contracted less than the previous
quarter. If you listen to the media however, things are rosy and we
can see light at the end of the tunnel. WHAT? When Bush was President
the economy was growing every quarter until the Democrats seized
control of Congress. The media was predicting doom every day, the
economy is terrible, it grew at a slower rate than expected, Bush
sucks, the Republicans suck, their policies don’t work,
blah,blah,blah. But now that there is a Democrat in the White House
and a Democratic Congress, all is right with the economy. So what if
people are losing jobs at an alarming rate and they are spending less
money, which will cause more people to lose their jobs. And just what
is a jobless recovery anyway? And while we are at it, what exactly
does adding or “saving” jobs mean? This administration has more
“doublespeak” terms than any I have ever heard.

Here’s the deal. The President does not believe in free market
capitalism. He learned his economics from Maynard Keynes, and Obamas’
own father, who was a Communist Economist in Kenya. He believes in
taxing the rich and spreading the wealth just like Karl Marx. He says
it almost everyday, and he said it to Joe the plumber when he thought
no one could hear.

Let me make economic theory easy for you Obama drones out there.

If a business is taxed more, will the business have more money or less
money? The answer is less money. If this business has less money,are
they going to hire more people or less people? The answer is less
people. Will that mean more people will have jobs or less people will
have jobs. The answer is less people will have jobs. If less people
have jobs, will they have more money to spend at the business you work
at or less money to spend at the business you work for? The answer is
less money to spend at the business you work. Then what happens? YOU
get laid off and so on and so on and so on.

If Taxes are cut, will the business have more money or less money? The
answer is more money. If the business has more money are they going to
hire more people ar less people? The answer is more people. If the
business has more money are they more apt or less apt to give you a
raise. The answer is, if they have more money they might give you a
raise, especially if there are other business out ther hiring more
people and you might go to work for their competitor if you can get
paid more. Competition is good.

Now, if you cut taxes and there are more and more businesses who have
more and more money, hiring people and maybe giving them raises due to
increased competition, are these people who are now working going to
have more money or less money? The answer is more money. If their are
more people who have more money are they more likely to buy your goods
and services or less likely? The answer is more likely. If this
happens are you more likely to have more money or less likely?.The
answer is YOU will have more money!

Where Obamas’ theory of economics fail is he believes that if you tax
people more the government will have more money. I just proved that to
be false. To make a point, would you rather have 20% of 1 million
dollars(200,000) or only 10% of 3 million dollars(300,000)? Of course
the answer is you want the SMALLER portion of the BIGGER pie. If you
cut taxes and expand the economy(the Pie) everyone wins. If you take
larger and larger percentages of the pie it will contract just like
the economy and everyone loses. Just ask the state budget directors
who can’t print money like our esteemed hero, the mighty, the all
powerful, OBAMA!

Speaking of printing money, I hope that all you economic illiterates
out there(Obama supporters) realize that the Government has no money
of its own right? Let me explain that to you also.

The government gets money 3 ways. They can tax you and business, which
is actually another tax on you because a business operates to make
money. If they don’t make enough they close. Now whenever they get
taxed they just pass the costs of the higher taxes to you, and then
YOU pay their tax. So taxing business is crazy. You end up paying
their tax. Now these taxes that are imposed on you by government come
from money that would otherwise be left in the private sector(which
Obama is out to destroy as much as possible i.e. car companies, banks,
insurance companies, doctors, hospitals, etc.). If this money is left
in the private sector then expansion of the pie continues. If it
doesn’t, the pie gets smaller(exactly what Obama is doing, on
purpose).

The second way government can get money is to print it. This is what
Obama is doing also(and is an impeachable offence). He swore to uphold
the Constitution which includes keeping this country sovereign and
keeping the currency strong. If you just print money our currency will
be worth less and less. There will be too many dollars chasing too few
goods which will cause inflation. Prices will rise, you will need more
and more of these dollars to purchase fewer and fewer goods. This is a
bad thing.

The third way the government can get money is by borrowing it at ever
increasing interest rates.(ask China how much of the U.S. debt they
own). Do you Obama morons out there know that in six months Obama has
got us into more debt than all other presidents combined in the
history of the country. HE IS DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY ON PURPOSE! HE
IS EVIL. There, now I feel better. Not as good as I’ll feel in 2010
and 2012, but better. Obama does not love this country. He only sees
its faults(in his eyes). He is out to change it fundamentally. I say
no. The only thing wrong with this country is there are too many
leftist who seek government office. Normal people are going to have
to start running for office or we are in trouble. Of course, I like to
fight. Maybe we need to thin the ranks out a little? We can start with
the anti-capitalist democrats. They can form their own country
somewhere else. It ain’t gonna happen here. I promise you that!!!
Post by zayton
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
What line did you isolate?
Absence of a refutation noted.
The one that now has
blank space
above and below it..
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department.
It only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to
add $3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the
Treasury Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's
Bureau of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the
penny--of total federal debt as of the close of the previous
business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was
$10,626,877,048,913.08. On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government
borrowed an additional $58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total
federal debt at the close of Friday's business day to
$13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of $3,039,049,594,342.88 since
President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal
debt includes two major components: debt held by the public, which
includes publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the
debt under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by
the public as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the
public has increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was
inaugurated, according to the Bureau of Public Debt, while
intragovernmnetal debt has increased 287.0889 billion.
And
Michelle Obama's Spanish vacation draws critics
As the president preaches frugality in lean economic times, his wife
and youngest daughter are vacationing at a luxury resort outside
Marbella.
Officials say the Obamas will pay for personal expenses.
August 06, 2010|By Peter Nicholas and Katherine Skiba, Tribune
Washington BureauReporting from Washington - As the economy endures
high unemployment and a jittery stock market, President Obama has
preached sacrifice and fiscal discipline. But the pictures coming
out of a sun-splashed Spanish resort this week may be sending a
different message.
How so?
According to the line I have isolated above; they are paying their
own expenses.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
First Lady Michelle Obama is in the midst of a five-day trip to a
luxury resort along with a few friends, her youngest daughter, aides
and Secret Service personnel. Her office said the family will pay
for personal expenses, but won't reveal the taxpayer cost for the
government employees.
Elected officials - Democrats and Republicans - were reluctant to
weigh in, not wanting to appear critical of the president's wife.
But the trip provided plenty of fodder for television news anchors,
talk-show hosts and bloggers.
Critics portrayed the foreign getaway as tone-deaf to the deep
economic anxiety back home. Earlier in the week, the first lady was
photographed walking through the streets of the Costa del Sol region
wearing a one-shouldered Jean Paul Gaultier top.
Every first family takes vacations. The criticism aimed at Michelle
Obama is that she chose to visit a foreign country rather than
remain in the U.S. and support its fragile economy.
Last month the first lady flew to the Florida Panhandle, a tourist
draw hit hard by the oil spill crisis, and delivered the message
that for parents "looking for things to do with their kids this
summer . this is a wonderful place to visit."
The opulence of the European trip also has drawn scrutiny. The
president has urged frugality in lean economic times. He once
cautioned that families saving money for college shouldn't "blow a
bunch of cash in Vegas."
Michelle Obama is staying at the Hotel Villa Padierna, a
Ritz-Carlton resort in the mountains outside Marbella. The resort
boasts two golf courses, a posh spa with Turkish baths, views of
the Mediterranean Sea and a high-end restaurant specializing in
avant-garde fare. Room rates start at $400 and rise to $6,500 for a
two-bedroom villa with a private pool and 24-hour butler service.
The danger for the Obamas is that the trip may feed perceptions that
they are elites, out of touch with struggling American families,
said Chris Wilson, a Republican pollster.
"This in and of itself doesn't hurt President Obama, but it plants a
seed in voters' minds that she's not like me, that they're not like
me," he said.
At least that is the seed your propaganda would like to plant.
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:13:04 -0500, "zayton"
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on
his trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe
you, but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of
course the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the
deficit and it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de
eagle fly even during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
spiritrising
2010-11-07 13:54:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
It’s Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department. It
only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to add
$3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury
Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department’s Bureau
of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount—to the penny--of total
federal debt as of the close of the previous business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday’s business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96—an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama’s inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal debt
includes two major components: debt held by the public, which includes
publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the debt
under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the public
as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the public has
increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated, according to
the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal debt has increased
287.0889 billion.
And
Michelle Obama's Spanish vacation draws critics
As the president preaches frugality in lean economic times, his wife
and youngest daughter are vacationing at a luxury resort outside
Marbella. Officials say the Obamas will pay for personal expenses.
August 06, 2010|By Peter Nicholas and Katherine Skiba, Tribune
Washington BureauReporting from Washington — As the economy endures
high unemployment and a jittery stock market, President Obama has
preached sacrifice and fiscal discipline. But the pictures coming out
of a sun-splashed Spanish resort this week may be sending a different
message.
First Lady Michelle Obama is in the midst of a five-day trip to a
luxury resort along with a few friends, her youngest daughter, aides
and Secret Service personnel. Her office said the family will pay for
personal expenses, but won't reveal the taxpayer cost for the
government employees.
Elected officials — Democrats and Republicans — were reluctant to
weigh in, not wanting to appear critical of the president's wife. But
the trip provided plenty of fodder for television news anchors,
talk-show hosts and bloggers.
Critics portrayed the foreign getaway as tone-deaf to the deep
economic anxiety back home. Earlier in the week, the first lady was
photographed walking through the streets of the Costa del Sol region
wearing a one-shouldered Jean Paul Gaultier top.
Every first family takes vacations. The criticism aimed at Michelle
Obama is that she chose to visit a foreign country rather than remain
in the U.S. and support its fragile economy.
Last month the first lady flew to the Florida Panhandle, a tourist
draw hit hard by the oil spill crisis, and delivered the message that
for parents "looking for things to do with their kids this summer …
this is a wonderful place to visit."
The opulence of the European trip also has drawn scrutiny. The
president has urged frugality in lean economic times. He once
cautioned that families saving money for college shouldn't "blow a
bunch of cash in Vegas."
Michelle Obama is staying at the Hotel Villa Padierna, a Ritz-Carlton
resort in the mountains outside Marbella. The resort boasts two golf
courses, a posh spa with Turkish baths, views of the Mediterranean Sea
and a high-end restaurant specializing in avant-garde fare. Room rates
start at $400 and rise to $6,500 for a two-bedroom villa with a
private pool and 24-hour butler service.
The danger for the Obamas is that the trip may feed perceptions that
they are elites, out of touch with struggling American families, said
Chris Wilson, a Republican pollster.
"This in and of itself doesn't hurt President Obama, but it plants a
seed in voters' minds that she's not like me, that they're not like
me," he said.
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his
trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.  You
add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear
that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an
economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
what i hate is in april i will have to pay a little over 2500us per
day for my 2 week vacation. but its worth it!
zayton
2010-11-06 23:49:57 UTC
Permalink
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department. It
only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to add
$3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury
Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
So, 7 trillion accumulated between 1990 and the beginning of the Obama era,
in spite of a budget surplus left at the end of the Clinton administration,
even using your figures.

About one third of the deficit since Obama took office is a direct result of
the Bush tax cuts which were going to stimulate the economy, but somehow
wrecked it instead.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's Bureau
of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the penny--of total
federal debt as of the close of the previous business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday's business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal debt
includes two major components: debt held by the public, which includes
publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the debt
under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the public
as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the public has
increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated, according to
the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal debt has increased
287.0889 billion.
So most of this "debt" is Americans investing in government bonds?

That somehow reflects badly on Obama?

Please see my clsoing two lines from my last post....
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his
trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course
the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and
it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even
during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 01:59:31 UTC
Permalink
Cite references for your 7 trillion allegation.

By the way, a conservative congress kept slick Willie making the eagle
fly.
Post by zayton
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department. It
only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to add
$3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the Treasury
Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
So, 7 trillion accumulated between 1990 and the beginning of the Obama era,
in spite of a budget surplus left at the end of the Clinton administration,
even using your figures.
About one third of the deficit since Obama took office is a direct result of
the Bush tax cuts which were going to stimulate the economy, but somehow
wrecked it instead.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's Bureau
of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the penny--of total
federal debt as of the close of the previous business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday's business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal debt
includes two major components: debt held by the public, which includes
publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the debt
under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the public
as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the public has
increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated, according to
the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal debt has increased
287.0889 billion.
So most of this "debt" is Americans investing in government bonds?
That somehow reflects badly on Obama?
Please see my clsoing two lines from my last post....
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on his
trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe you,
but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course
the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and
it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even
during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
zayton
2010-11-07 02:30:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Cite references for your 7 trillion allegation.
As I said, that is what your own figures show.
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
By the way, a conservative congress kept slick Willie making the eagle
fly.
Sure it did: then destroyed the economy under Bush. Sure.
That makes just your kind of sense.
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by zayton
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department.
It only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to
add $3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the
Treasury Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
So, 7 trillion accumulated between 1990 and the beginning of the
Obama era, in spite of a budget surplus left at the end of the
Clinton administration, even using your figures.
About one third of the deficit since Obama took office is a direct
result of the Bush tax cuts which were going to stimulate the
economy, but somehow wrecked it instead.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's
Bureau of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the
penny--of total federal debt as of the close of the previous
business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday's business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal
debt includes two major components: debt held by the public, which
includes publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the
debt under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the
public as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the
public has increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated,
according to the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal
debt has increased 287.0889 billion.
So most of this "debt" is Americans investing in government bonds?
That somehow reflects badly on Obama?
Please see my clsoing two lines from my last post....
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on
his trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe
you, but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of
course the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the
deficit and it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de
eagle fly even during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 03:37:06 UTC
Permalink
American Economy Destroyed by Design

David L Lamon

Obama Is Making the Same Mistake As . . .

Twenty years ago, Japan was one of the richest countries in the world
and had one of the highest standards of living. Everyone was talking
about “Theory Z” and the Japanese state-controlled approach to
business.

Then, in the 1990s, the Japanese asset bubble in stocks and real
estate went through a crash similar to what we are experiencing now.

Rather than use free-market approaches to address the problem,
Japanese policymakers did many of the same things the Obama
administration is doing today, such as keeping interest rates
artificially low, spending heavily — and deliberately devaluing the
yen to spur exports.

The result: The Japanese economy has NEVER recovered. The Nikkei, the
Japanese stock market, plummeted 86% — and is STILL down 75% from its
historic high.

Today, the Japanese rank 24th in the world in per-capita income,
according to the International Monetary Fund.

Like Japan, the United States could see a significant unwinding of its
real wealth. Please read my commentary at bottom of page for
clarification.

Wall Street cheerleaders, sly politicians, and the liberal media keep
chanting, “The recovery is here!”

Sure, the stock market has rallied quite nicely these past few months;
sure, the manipulated government statistics show that all is well; and
sure, the media loves to report that Obama has saved America.

But what was sacrificed to create this so-called “recovery.”

Why your life savings are in jeopardy as this fragile recovery could
unravel in 2010

The culprit: To borrow a phrase from Will Sonnet of Guns of Will
Sonnet “no brag just fact”. It is a “secret” government plan.

2010: The Year the Recovery” Unravels

· The U.S. dollar (and your wealth) are going the way of the Mexican
peso: down!

More than $10 trillion in government spending is triggering a sudden
and massive devaluation of the greenback.
The TARP chief told Congress the federal bailout will now total over
$23 trillion! That would be over $70,000 per person.
· Unbeknown to most investors, the Obama administration is quietly
planning to devalue the U.S. dollar even MORE. The decision has been
made . . . and it’s working.

· Obama adviser Warren Buffett accidentally revealed in a recent CNBC
interview what the Administration REALLY has planned all along.

Buffett told the interviewer that the United States will do what every
other country has done when faced with huge obligations and decreasing
revenues — inflate (devalue) the currency!

Dollar Devaluation Is a Done Deal

The reason is simple.

· The Democrats have waited nearly 30 years, ever since Ronald Reagan
was elected, to begin spending money on social programs again.

· They’re not about to let a global economic wipeout stand in their
way.

· Deliberately devaluing the U.S. dollar will make U.S. government
debt obligations less onerous, American exports relatively cheap, and
rally the stock market.

· There is only one problem with their plan!

· By causing inflation to soar, it will wipe out the life savings of
generations . . . and destroy the U.S. economy for decades to come . .
.

Reasons why the global recovery will be stopped dead in its tracks in
the United States .

· Rising commodity prices are the canary in the mine shaft when it
comes to inflation . . .

· Obama’s nationalization of healthcare wil further sink the dollar
because of our dependence of foreigners to finance our debt.

· Investing in foreign markets will be forced.

· Wall Street’s “bandit capitalism” is leading to “bandit socialism”

· When China and other foreign investors stop investing in America the
dollar will collapse and the country will be bankrupt.

The Destruction of the Dollar
And Your Portfolio, Has Started

· When the market crashed more than 18 months ago, the dollar
strengthened significantly. Investors worldwide fled to the greenback.
Hundreds of billions of poured into the United States.

· But all that ended quickly when Barack Obama took office.

· Once Obama and congressional Democrats began handing out trillions
of dollars in bailouts and posting record deficits, the confidence of
world investors was badly shaken. The value of the U.S. dollar began
plunging.

· Since taking office, the Obama administration has increased the
monetary base by a staggering $10 trillion (see chart below). In less
than a year, it managed to DOUBLE the expected annual budget deficit
to almost $2 trillion.

The result was predictable: The stock market rallied . . . but the
once mighty dollar has PLUNGED against foreign currencies.

· That’s WHY Warren Buffett, for the first time ever, shifted more
than 20 percent of Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio outside the country
and into non-dollar assets.

· This estimate does not include companies he holds, such as
Coca-Cola, that draw huge portions of their earnings from abroad.

Inflation Is About to Wipe Out the
Stock Market Gains of Recent Months!

· These are dangerous times. If you have spent the past 10 YEARS
investing in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, your investments have
lost money — a lot of money.

· Since the market hit its historic 2007 high, stocks have plummeted.
In March of this year, the Dow hit a new decade low of 6,547 — a drop
of more than 53 percent from the high. The market has rebounded since
that low but remains down nearly 40 percent.

Here is what should really have you worried and reveals what socialist
are all about

The recent stock market rally was fueled almost entirely by the
MASSIVE infusion of $10 trillion in borrowed government cash,
according to our analysts.

All that government borrowing has boosted the market but will trigger
inflation that the United States hasn’t seen since the 1970s.

If the stock market during the next two years rises by more than 8
percent a year but real inflation hits the U.S. economy at more than
10 percent, investors will experience negative asset value.

The same thing has happened with the socialist-controlled Venezuelan
stock market, one of the few stock markets in the world doing well
now. When you factor in that country’s skyrocketing inflation rate —
now averaging 30 percent! — investors in Venezuela are losing their
shirts.

My Commentary

Clinton is credited with being one of the best presidents ever but I
seriously dispute that because aside from his moral deficiencies, his
destruction of the mortgage market through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
through the use of his Community Reinvestment Act with willing
accomplices in the house and senate from both sides of the aisle that
forced lenders to make loans to people they knew couldn’t afford them.
From this fiasco derivative markets (high-risk investment they knew
were bad) kicked into high gear with the creation of the Black and
Shoals plan. These derivatives was used as a way to pass the buck,
disguise and hide their deception to bring down the U.S. economy. It
is for this reason it is pertinent the Federal Reserve be fully
investigated national security issue or not. We are big enough to
handle the truth don’t you think? Besides if there is a chance to turn
things around we must know all the details of what caused the demise
in the first place wouldn’t you think? This is an example of political
expediency used by Clinton knowing the results would not be revealed
until well after he left office. Also Clinton’s push of NAFTA with the
help of Republicans heard the words or Ross Perot’s “Giant Sucking
Sound” become a reality because of corporations moving their
manufacturing operations overseas with taxpayer subsidies paving the
way. The result is a dangerously low number of Middle-Class left in
America and an economy solely dependent on credit and service, which
as we now see cannot sustain itself. Consumer spending makes up over
70% of the GDP, which strongly discourages saving, hence saving
produces no interest on money put into financial systems. Again, I say
this is being done by design. I say dangerous because an economy based
on capitalistic ideology cannot stand without a strong Middle-Class
based in manufacturing. These are the people that pay close attention
to what is going on in the country and by far the largest voting bloc.
They are the ones that provide jobs to over 70% of the people in
America. On the other hand, for tyranny to prevail or a dictatorship a
rich and poor must be the dominant makeup of society, which is where
we are currently and dwindling at breakneck speed. This is why I have
repeatedly written over the years its “MANUFACTURING STUPID”. In 1955
the GPD or gross domestic products was 78% based in manufacturing
hence a growing economy and wealth but now that traitors have seized
control of the U.S. government it is down to 14%. Bottom line: those
responsible for the creation of a one-world government know America’s
economy and middle-class must be destroyed to bring America into
subjection to their demands.

Zechariah 14:14 and Revelation 20: 7 are speaking about the same time
period of the anti-Christ kingdom. And the wealth of all the
surrounding nations shall be gathered together: Gold, silver, and
apparel in great abundance. Satan will be released from his prison and
will go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of
the earth, Gog and Magog (one-world government), to gather them
together to battle, whose number is as the sand of the sea. Isn’t this
what we are witnessing today a concentration of wealth in the hands of
a few?

What God Expects from his Virtuous Wife and yes buying and selling is
all a part of manufacturing because it provides the means to do all
else. so yes God is capitalistic and socialistic. From the beginning
he gave man the priviledge of choice or freedom to make his own
decisions.

The Virtuous Wife

Proverbs 31:10-24

10 Who can find a virtuous wife?

For her worth is far above rubies.

11 The heart of her husband safely trusts her;

So he will have no lack of gain.

12 She does him good and not evil

All the days of her life.

13 She seeks wool and flax,

And willingly works with her hands.

14 She is like the merchant ships,

She brings her food from afar.

15 She also rises while it is yet night,

And provides food for her household,

And a portion for her maidservants.

16 She considers a field and buys it;

From her profits she plants a vineyard.

17 She girds herself with strength,

And strengthens her arms.

18 She perceives that her merchandise is good,

And her lamp does not go out by night.

19 She stretches out her hands to the distaff,

And her hand holds the spindle.

20 She extends her hand to the poor,

Yes, she reaches out her hands to the needy.

21 She is not afraid of snow for her household,

For all her household is clothed with scarlet.

22 She makes tapestry for herself;

Her clothing is fine linen and purple.

23 Her husband is known in the gates,

When he sits among the elders of the land.

24 She makes linen garments and sells them,

And supplies sashes for the merchants.

My question to all Americans is “will you continue to sit on your
hands and wait until you are personally affected to take action or
will you join all Americans and take the necessary steps to right the
wrongs done to America’s citizens”?

Various sources of research were used for this article.

Bookmark & Share
Post by zayton
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Cite references for your 7 trillion allegation.
As I said, that is what your own figures show.
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
By the way, a conservative congress kept slick Willie making the eagle
fly.
Sure it did: then destroyed the economy under Bush. Sure.
That makes just your kind of sense.
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by zayton
It's Official: Obama Has Now Borrowed $3 Trillion
Monday, October 18, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey
- It's official: The Obama administration has now borrowed $3
trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent
country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling
victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a
total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department.
It only took from Jan. 20, 2009, the day President Barack Obama was
inaugurated, until Oct. 15, 2010, for the Obama administration to
add $3 trillion to the federal debt.
The overall debt of the federal government, according to the
Treasury Department, is now $13.666 trillion.
So, 7 trillion accumulated between 1990 and the beginning of the
Obama era, in spite of a budget surplus left at the end of the
Clinton administration, even using your figures.
About one third of the deficit since Obama took office is a direct
result of the Bush tax cuts which were going to stimulate the
economy, but somehow wrecked it instead.
Each business day, in the afternoon, the Treasury Department's
Bureau of the Public Debt publishes the exact amount-to the
penny--of total federal debt as of the close of the previous
business day.
At the close of business on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the bureau,
the total debt of the federal government was $10,626,877,048,913.08.
On Oct. 15, 2010, the federal government borrowed an additional
$58,979,549,154.06, bringing the total federal debt at the close of
Friday's business day to $13,665,926,643,255.96-an increase of
$3,039,049,594,342.88 since President Obama's inauguration.
As calculated by the Bureau of the Public Debt, the total federal
debt includes two major components: debt held by the public, which
includes publicly traded securities such as Treasury bonds, and
intragovernmental debt, which is money the government borrows from
theoretically dedicated funds within the government itself, such as
the Social Security trust fund.
The overwhelming majority of the $3.039 trillion increase in the
debt under President Obama has come in the form of debt held by the
public as opposed to intragovernmental debt. Debt held by the
public has increased $2.75196 trillion since Obama was inaugurated,
according to the Bureau of Public Debt, while intragovernmnetal
debt has increased 287.0889 billion.
So most of this "debt" is Americans investing in government bonds?
That somehow reflects badly on Obama?
Please see my clsoing two lines from my last post....
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
Post by spiritrising
Post by Don't Kill Liberals Unless You Torture Them First
That's right. =A0Obama and his cunt are spending $2 billion on
his trip to India.
That would feed quite a few dotheads.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
show me that 2 billion is being spent and i might even believe
you, but thats a lie
That's because you're still intoxicated on the Kool-Aid, Moonbat.
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of
course the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the
deficit and it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de
eagle fly even during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
zayton
2010-11-15 18:56:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
American Economy Destroyed by Design
David L Lamon
Obama Is Making the Same Mistake As . . .
Twenty years ago, Japan was one of the richest countries in the world
Two years ago the United States economy was circling the drain as a result
of eight years of neo-conservative economic theory.
Connie
2010-11-15 21:15:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by zayton
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
American Economy Destroyed by Design
David L Lamon
Obama Is Making the Same Mistake As . . .
Twenty years ago, Japan was one of the richest countries in the world
Two years ago the United States economy was circling the drain as a result
of eight years of neo-conservative economic theory.
Neo-classical; supply-side theory.

unknown
2010-11-06 22:45:55 UTC
Permalink
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear that
dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an economic
depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
Apparently you do, if you're a disingenuous republican attempting to heap
republican additions to the deficit onto an administration that inherited
them.
Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
2010-11-06 22:53:09 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:45:55 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear that
dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an economic
depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
Apparently you do, if you're a disingenuous republican attempting to heap
republican additions to the deficit onto an administration that inherited
them.
Bush wasted money like a democrat but the anti-American, Marxist,
race-baiting, pro-share-the-wealth thug who replaced him makes Bush
look like Scrooge.
unknown
2010-11-06 22:54:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Bush wasted money like a democrat but the anti-American, Marxist,
race-baiting, pro-share-the-wealth thug who replaced him makes
Bush look like Scrooge.
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him as "Marxist"
and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-06 23:01:45 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:54:05 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Bush wasted money like a democrat but the anti-American, Marxist,
race-baiting, pro-share-the-wealth thug who replaced him makes
Bush look like Scrooge.
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him as "Marxist"
and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us. Hey,
dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the campaign
that we need to redistribute wealth?

You moonbats really DO live in another world.
unknown
2010-11-06 23:09:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by unknown
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Bush wasted money like a democrat but the anti-American, Marxist,
race-baiting, pro-share-the-wealth thug who replaced him makes
Bush look like Scrooge.
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him as
"Marxist" and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us.
That program isn't in place as yet and, any income-to-premium ratios have
not been implemented.
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Hey, dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the campaign
that we need to redistribute wealth?
Hey, shithead, the capitalist system redistributes wealth during the process
of buying and selling, (not in a Marxist manner of merely taking from the
'rich' and giving to the 'poor').
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 01:47:24 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:09:01 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by unknown
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Bush wasted money like a democrat but the anti-American, Marxist,
race-baiting, pro-share-the-wealth thug who replaced him makes
Bush look like Scrooge.
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him as
"Marxist" and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us.
That program isn't in place as yet and, any income-to-premium ratios have
not been implemented.
I know, and already rates are rising and MEDICARE coverage is
diminished.
Post by unknown
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Hey, dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the campaign
that we need to redistribute wealth?
Hey, shithead, the capitalist system redistributes wealth during the process
of buying and selling, (not in a Marxist manner of merely taking from the
'rich' and giving to the 'poor').
Hey, welfare cunt, redistribution is the heart of socialism; the
system that thwarts achievement and growth.

But you folks on the "gimme end" don't give a shit about that.
unknown
2010-11-07 02:15:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him
as "Marxist" and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us.
That program isn't in place as yet and, any income-to-premium ratios
have not been implemented.
I know, and already rates are rising and MEDICARE coverage is
diminished.
Yet, this does not tie a program which has not yet been implemented to those
factors.
Post by unknown
Hey, dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the
campaign that we need to redistribute wealth?
Hey, shithead, the capitalist system redistributes wealth during the
process of buying and selling, (not in a Marxist manner of merely
taking from the 'rich' and giving to the 'poor').
Hey, welfare cunt, redistribution is the heart of socialism; the
system that thwarts achievement and growth.
Hey, uncomprehending dipshit, "redistribution" is not exclusively defined as
a socialist process. To reiterate this and dumb it down for you; the
process of buying and selling 'redistributes' wealth. That process
contributes to fiscal growth, rather than thwarting it.
Post by unknown
But you folks on the "gimme end" don't give a shit about that.
I never proposed being at the "gimme end" of your sophist argument.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 03:36:59 UTC
Permalink
The United States now has a Communist president as of January 2009. Some prefer to call President Obama a “Globalist” instead of a Communist, but there's not a dime's difference.
I was saddened on November 5th, 2008 to see Obama's supporters proudly waving Communist flags after the election. Can you imagine? What happened to this once great society in which we live? The saddest part is that most of the American people actually want Communism, because they've only seen it's friendly side thus far. The dark side of Communism will soon come upon us in America. Sadly, the average American citizen won't wake up until it directly affects them adversely. Communism is not an ideology; but rather, a secret weapon of THE ILLUMINATI intended to enslaved the human race.
America's love for sin has made our nation weak, complacent and indifferent. This has been by design, by the Communists, who have engineered this mess. For those who have studied, then you know that Communism was created by the Banksters (i.e., the New World Order gang), as a vehicle by which to achieve world government. This plot goes back not only centuries, but millenniums, as Satan is the god of this world (2nd Corinthians 4:4) and has desired to finish what God stopped at the tower AND CITY of Babel (Genesis 11:7-8). The detached capstone on The Great Pyramid (displayed on the back of every U.S. dollar), represents the unfinished tower and city of Babel, which will be the Beast system of the coming Antichrist, aka, the New World Order. You'll never hear THE TRUTH explained any simpler than what I just gave you. This is what is going on in the world today, from a Biblical perspective by a born-again Christian.
Some have questioned whether Obama is a Communist or not? I can tell you by definition of the word “Communism” that HE IS. One of the definitions of the noun Communism is “a socialist who advocates Communism.” Obama is an Anti-American, God-hating Communist wrapped in a smile. Obama was not elected; he was chosen and placed into office. I am not saying that Barack Obama is the Antichrist, but it is a Biblical teaching that high political positions will be given by Satan in the End Times... Revelation 13:2b, “and the dragon [Satan] gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.” The Antichrist will have great authority. It is very interesting that President Obama is the FIRST U.S. President to ever be made chairman of the United Nations Security Council (a violation of the U.S. Constitution). CNN reported that Obama has been called "The President of the world.” Certainly, the overwhelming international public support of Barack Obama is arguably a form of worship.
Even now our economy is faltering, being bolstered up by deficit spending and a mass flood of illegal immigrants willing to work for peanuts. The only people saying we're not in a depression are the people who still have jobs and a home. Communism sounds great in theory; but in reality it always leads to an oppressive form of tyrant government and a failed economy. Communism is synonymous with atheism, anarchy and a brutal police state regime. Please read, Barack Obama's Communist Connections.
Obamanation or Abomination?
Obama Voted Against the 2nd Amendment Four Times
As a U.S. senator in Illinois, Obama wanted a Federal Law to ban all gun shops within 5-miles of a school or park, which would effectively eliminate every gun shop in the United States. But at the same time he DIDN'T oppose porn shops near schools. Obama wrote legislation that would make you a felon if your gun was stolen and used in a crime. Obama is for a total ban on handguns. When asked by journalist Tim Russert if he would help get gun owners licensed and registered, Obama stated: "I don't think that we can get that done." Without guns (which is our 2nd Amendment right), we have no way of enforcing our remaining rights. Woe unto America!
TIME magazine exposed Barack Obama as a Communist prior to the November 2008 presidential election.
The following article was written in February of 2008, several months before Obama was elected as president...
Obama’s Communist Connections
The ever-illusive almost chameleon-like Barack Obama seems to have more secrets than one man in his position should have. However, in spite of media resistance another clue to the real Obama has turned up for your inspection.
In Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father, he refers to developing a close relationship while in Hawaii with Frank Marshall Davis. Davis was a father figure and mentor that often supplied Barack with career advice. What makes this relevant is that Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union.
Obama’s Communist Party connection through Davis now proves even more ominous considering his bid for the White House. Decades ago, the CPUSA had tens of thousands of members, some of them covert agents who had penetrated the U.S. Government. It received secret subsidies from the old Soviet Union.
Obama’s communist connection now adds to mounting public concern about a candidate who has come out of virtually nowhere, with a brief U.S. Senate legislative record, to become the Democratic Party frontrunner for the U.S. presidency.
Obama has well-documented “Socialist Connections,” which helps explain why he sponsored a “Global Poverty Act” designed to send hundreds of billions of dollars of U.S. foreign aid to the rest of the world, in order to meet U.N. demands. The Obama bill passed the House and a Senate committee, but now awaits full Senate action.
Again this forces the question, who is Barack Obama? The media has forgotten that one of it’s jobs is to provide information that protects the people from a corrupt government. Now it’s primary goal seems to be protect the government from the people.
Will we discover the real Obama before it’s too late?
SOURCE: http://lordcrimson.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/obama%e2%80%99s-communist-connections/
Woe unto the United States! I've been preaching for a long time that America's love for sin would eventually lead to our destruction as a nation. When a known Communist is elected to lead the United States, we are not far from joining China's oppressive regime. The average citizen has no idea just how Communist America already has become. Read Karl Marx's 10 Planks of his Communist Manifesto. Martin Luther King Jr. was a known Communist, involved in at least 60 Communist front organizations. Yet, every January Americans foolishly honor Martin Luther King Jr. as a great American. It is tragic.
Someone asked me after the election how I felt as a Caucasian about having a black President? I replied that Obama is also half White and that my concern wasn't the color of his skin; but rather, his allegiance to Marxism and his Communist affiliations. I have nothing personal against Mr. Obama, and he is certainly a dynamic and eloquent speaker, and carries himself well; but anytime the government gains more control is a bad thing, which our founding fathers sternly warned us about...
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." —James Madison
Despite the recent publicity stunts aimed at convincing Americans that Obama is “undoing” the damage George W. Bush did, nothing could be further from the truth. A perfect example is Obama's recent decision to lift Bush's ban on UNFPA abortion spending. If one considers all the trillions of dollars which the Bush Administration bilked from the American people, mostly for the illegal war in Iraq, which caused the death of over 1.3 million Iraqi's, it's a laugh to even think that Obama is doing things differently than Bush. Perhaps on a small scale; but there's NOT a dime's difference between Obama and Bush—they're both in league working for the same New World Order puppeteers.
Also, the Bush Administration gave literally BILLIONS of dollars to fund Planned Parenthood, the biggest provider of abortion services in the U.S.; yet Bush claimed to be against abortion. Right! When will Christians wake up and stop voting for these phonies?
President Obama Supports Murderous Planned Parenthood
Watch this disturbing video which shows that racism still plays a role in the abortion industry today . . .
Margaret Sanger (1879-1966) was a hateful racist. She is the founder of Planned Parenthood. This video evidences that racism is still alive and cruel in today's abortion industry.
Particularly disturbing is President's Obama's comment at the end of the video that Planned Parenthood is helping men who “have enough sense to realize you're helping them all across the country.” Isn't that sad? Basically, President Obama thanked Planned Parenthood for helping men avert the responsibility of fatherhood. That's the only conclusion that can be drawn from his horrible statement. How is Planned Parenthood helping men who “have enough sense to realize” it?
Obama also thanked Planned Parenthood for “helping families.” How does killing children help families? What a deception. It's all a pack of malicious lies intended to mislead the public. Abortion, feminism and homosexuality are all Communist paid for agendas intended to undermine America's families and destroy our nation's sovereignty. Planned Parenthood's only purpose is to murder as many human beings as they possible can. Where does “motherhood” come into play when the only plan is to kill the child? It's all a big lie. You see, they have to make it sound like abortion is good for the family, and that they're helping and doing your family a favor.[1] The only one they're helping is Satan.
Communism is Outright Theft!
The photo to the right accurately depicts Socialism and Communism, which forcefully take (steal) what is yours and transfers that wealth to the banks. It is pure theft! I used to think that Communism takes from the rich to gives it to the poor; but that's not the case at all. Communism is the rich stealing from the middle-class and driving everyone into poverty.
The Banksters have deliberately taken tens-of-millions of American jobs and sent them to foreign countries to force the American public to accept Communism (i.e., total government control). For decades most Americans didn't care, because most of us had jobs, but now that most people don't have jobs and the economy has gone to Hell, people are finally waking up and getting angry. Millions of U.S. citizens are losing their homes, such as the tragic story below.
This woman wouldn't have lost her home if she had a job, but there are no jobs anymore. The consequences of our treasonous leaders who've allowed corporations to eliminate American jobs for decades have finally caught up with us as a nation. Judgment Day is upon us. There are no more jobs! There will be no recovery! America is going to become as a third-world nation stricken in poverty, while the Bush family has bought millions-of-dollars worth of property to move to South America. The elite are moving out of America, because they see what is coming.
The following video documents the tragic story of a woman in Baltimore who lost her home over a $362 unpaid water bill. Some crooked bankers stole her home. Hell will be hot!
This is So Evil—Thieving Baltimore City and Bank Steal Woman's Paid Home Over $362 Unpaid Water Bill
The Police State will continue, rest assured. The Anti-American Patriot Acts, FEMA overhaul, Gestapo airport security, open borders, militarization of local police and other infringements of citizen's Constitutional rights, will continue under Obama and only intensify.
Since taking oath of office, President Obama has broken most of his promises. He lied about shutting down NAFTA, Obama lied about allowing the public to have a 5-day waiting period to view all new laws before being voted on by congress. The Banker Bailout Bill didn't allow congress even an hour to view over 1,000 pages, and the public never saw anything. We were criminally bamboozled once again! Obama lied about bringing the troops home. Instead he has sent another 80,000 American troops to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, gearing up for war against Iran (which will likely result in World War Three). The average person has little idea just how corrupt everything has become nowadays. Watch this shocking video of what was uncovered during hurricane Katrina. This is just New Orleans. The entire country is falling apart and it is so evident now. America is so close to hell on earth. World War Three is just around the corner!
A banker makes more money in a day of war than in a year of peace!
Obama lied about not hiring donors and lobbyists to work on his White House Staff; yet he has appointment many of them, straight off Wall Street, lying to the American people who trusted his campaign promises. Obama lied about doing something to close the open borders. He did nothing! Obama has done nothing to bring jobs back to America. In fact, 23.7 TRILLION dollars have been looted during Obama's watch as President. The criminal Banksters are looting our economy, causing corporations to move overseas to exploit slave labor. Americans are losing their homes and times are going to get MUCH WORSE, soon! We are at 11:59:59 before midnight and everything's about to implode in America!!!
The bankers are counting on it. They want a collapse to happen. Because in the ruins, there will rise up a New World Order the likes we have never seen before. With each false flag terror attack, the New World Order gains new ground over everyday common people who have their heads buried in the sand, loving football more than THE TRUTH. Go back to sleep America, the Police State is not done yet. If you ask someone what year the 911-attacks happened, they don't know. But they all know the latest filthy movie out of Hollywood. They all know about pop culture. Most of them can't even name the 5-parts of the First Amendment.
THE TRUTH means nothing to people these days. This is why the Antichrist will succeed (2nd Thessalonians 2:10). The greatest thing you can do to fight the New World Order is to love THE TRUTH! Study, research, seek out, distribute, preach and cherish THE TRUTH. This is why Jesus commanded for us in John 5:39 to SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES! God's Word is truth (John 17:17). Why do you think the Bible was banned from Public School in 1963? It's so that children wouldn't have THE TRUTH. And now look at the morally-toxic society we survive in today in the U.S.
After murdering 50,000,000 American babies by abortion, we now have 50,000,000 illegal foreigners coming into our country to make up the missing workforce. Unfortunately, they are so poor that they're also eating with our food stamps, saturating our hurting schools with non-English-speaking students, living in free Section-8 housing, are getting promoted over citizen's kids because of racial profiling, are bankrupting our hospitals and then blame American citizens for all their problems.
So what we have here are foreigners illegally sneaking into America without any honor, milking the system to rob legitimate hard working American citizens via welfare payouts, committing one-third of all crimes in the U.S., and then blaming America's citizens for their homeland's problems. Talk about ungrateful. I'm tired of hearing paid off stooges like Sean Hannity say that Americans won't do the work which illegals are willing to do. The truth of the matter is that American citizens can't survive on $2 an hour. We do you think 10-20 illegals pile together in rented apartments? That's the only way they can survive. And what do they do with the rest of the money, they buy booze, booze and more booze. Not all of them; but a majority of the Hispanic immigrants in America that I've seen are drunks. We have lost our country. There is no border. No language. No honor. No culture. No class. No morals. No economy. No jobs. No government. Sad!
It's quite a paradox when one considers that in "The Land Of The Free," the United States incarcerates more of it's citizens than any other nation in the world. With only 5% of the world's population in the U.S., our prisons contain 25% of the world's inmates. Think about that.
The Evils of Communism
Communism has NEVER been established upon faith in God; but rather, upon faith in the government. Without an oppressive government to regulate everything, brainwash children through public schooling, and heavily tax it's citizens; men naturally tend toward capitalism and freedom. Communism is the end result of an immoral society that abandons God.
Communism is of the Devil, an unjust economic system that rewards the lazy and punishes the diligent. To give jobs, healthcare, education and other forms of public aid to ILLEGAL immigrants is Communism. They have no rightful claim to the wealth of hard-working American citizens; but the Communist U.S. government steals it from us to give to them. Illegal immigrants ought to be apprehended and punished by law.
Not only has our government betrayed us by allowing ILLEGALS to flood into America by the millions, and rolled out the red carpet for them by providing all sorts of public assistance, but recently the Bush Administration gave $1,000,000,000 to Mexico. Yet, American citizens are harassed for every penny they owe the IRS. When does the treason stop? America is being subverted from within. Our "elected" politicians are sworn to the destruction of America; yet, they have fooled us with their rhetoric into believing that they love America. Liars!
The recent bailout of the housing market by the U.S. government is Communism. In spite of the bail out, one million Americans still lost their homes last year. This is madness! The trillion dollars spent on the war in Iraq could have purchased 4,000,000 American homes at $250,000 each!!! The recent real-estate fallout is all a big scam intended to broaden the government's control over America's housing market. The first plank of Marx's Communism is the abolition of private property. James Bovard has wisely stated...
"Government cannot control property without controlling people. Every extension of control over property means a decrease in citizens' ability to rely on themselves and plan their own lives' We face a choice of private property or political subjugation."
SOURCE: http://www.illuminati-news.com/american-communism.htm
Our Washington politicians more than doubled the American national debt in one weekend for a bunch of crooks and incompetents. That money is coming out of taxpayer pockets! The resulting government can only be Fascist.
James Bovard further states...
"Private property marks the boundary between the citizen and the State. The degree of respect the State shows for property rights will largely determine how much privacy, autonomy, and independence the citizen has."
SOURCE: http://www.illuminati-news.com/american-communism.htm
One doesn't have to think too hard to realize where America is headed when the government gets into the property business. Woe unto America. In the end, Communism stifles ambition, confiscates wealth, discourages personal endeavor, rewards the undeserving and undermines society. Communism sounds great in theory; but in reality, the only way one can succeed without sacrificing is if someone else sacrifices without succeeding. There are no free meals in life, someone has to pay.
"A free lunch is only found in mousetraps."
- John Capozzi
Despite The Beatles retarded hit song, "Back In The U.S.S.R." (boy you don't know how lucky you are!), one-third of all Russians today live on LESS THAN $30 A MONTH!!! Think about that. That's $360 a year to survive on! Does Communism still sound like a great idea? Little-by-little, America's economy is spiraling downward into poverty wages, higher taxes, non-affordable healthcare insurance and skyrocketing inflation. Interestingly, the Communist leaders themselves always live high-on-the-hog. It's the average citizen who suffers. Barack Obama is a rotten Communist and has vowed to implement socialist polices as U.S. President.
Here's what Dr. John R. Rice has to say about the evils of Socialism...
"Private ownership instead of government ownership is Capitalism... The capitalistic system always tends towards freedom and better income as long as more machinery is used and better methods are adopted. On the other hand, the socialistic system always tends to enslave people and bring more poverty and trouble, as it has done already in England and Russia."
SOURCE: Dr. Rice... Here Are More Questions; Question: Are farm co-operatives, farm subsidies, etc., right?; by Dr. John R. Rice, pg. 243, 244, Sword of the Lord Publishers; 1973, ISBN: 0-87398-157-X
Obama may appear as a type of savior to the American people for a time after he takes office; but his socialist give-away programs will ultimately end in a Communist Police State, a failed economy and policies paralleling Communist China today.
Obama is Not a Christian in Any Biblical Sense
Lest anyone should think Barack Obama is a born-again Christian, here is solid proof that he is NOT a Christian in any Biblical sense. Please send the following videos to everyone you know to warn them about Mr. Obama, because he is a wolf in sheep's clothing . . .
Why Obama is Not a Christian: Reason #1
Why Obama is Not a Christian: Reason #2
Why Obama is Not a Christian: Reason #3
Why Obama is Not a Christian: Reason #4
Why Obama is Not a Christian: Reason #5
Why Obama is Not a Christian: Reason #6
Why Obama is Not a Christian: Reason #7
Psychopaths in The White House
One thing that becomes very apparent when you leave the U.S. newsmedia bubble is that Americans do not receive real news on dire conditions in Palestine. When Palestinians are portrayed in the U.S. newsmedia it's exclusively as poverty cases, malcontents, and "terrorists." The fact that Palestinians have a history and a culture, and that they were removed from their lands and homes at gunpoint and herded into "refugee camps" is completely censored. With dual U.S.-Israeli citizen Rahm Emmanuel, son of a member of an Israeli group designated as terrorist by the British government, acting as Barrack Obama's right hand man, this moral blindness is unlikely to change.
Here's one of the stories you'll never see on US TV...
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/492.html
Consider the following stern warning from Pastor Texe Marrs...
America's Future Is Now in the Hands of Two Psychopaths at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave: President Barack Obama, Israeli Agent "Rahm the Cruel" Emanuel, and a Leninist America by 2012: On January 20, 2009, President Barack Obama takes possession of the Oval Office. "Rahm the Cruel" Emanuel takes over as White House Chief of Staff. Obama and Emanuel are both in the employ of the Israeli Mossad, and "Rahm the Cruel," a former Wall Street manipulator and Chicago Mafioso, actually served in the Israeli military. Together, Obama, our charming and charismatic young President, and Rahm, his Stalinist overseer and Mossad controller, will lash and steer the American Republic ever forward into the morass of a Leninist dictatorship of the elite. Unless something incredible intervenes, by 2012 we shall experience the final, irrevocable "Sovietization of America."
SOURCE: Power of Prophecy: America's Future Is Now in the Hands of Two Psychopaths at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
America's Future Is Now in the Hands of Two Psychopaths at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Satan is the god of this world (2nd Corinthians 4:4) and he operates in secrecy through occult organizations, of which all of America's recent Presidents have been members.
Woe Unto America's Children!
It is a shame and tragic that little school children are being indoctrinated into believing that homosexuality is good and acceptable; but they are not taught the truth. The Bible is God's Word, which condemns all forms of lesbianism, homosexuality, cross-dressing, transgender (sex change) and same-sex marriage.
Obama Appoints She-Male To Commerce Post
'Gay' sex morally good, says Obama pick
ObamaCare Will Put Planned Parenthood Clinics Inside Schools
Obama’s TSA Nominee Targets Anti-Government Christians
Obama Appoints Sicko GLSEN Founder, Kevin Jennings, to Head “Safe Schools” Effort
Barack Obama Kids and Hitler Youth Sing for Their Leader
Red Alert—Children are Being Led to Worship Obama
Obama Youth: Homeland Security Recruits Girl Scouts
Read what some left-wing sicko public school teacher did in California...
A California school system refuses to say what action, if any, it will take after it received complaints about a kindergarten teacher who encouraged her students to sign "pledge cards" in support of gays.
During a celebration of National Ally Week, Tara Miller, a teacher at the Faith Ringgold School of Arts and Science in Hayward, Calif., passed out cards produced by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network to her class of kindergartners.
The cards asked signers to be "an ally" and to pledge to "not use anti-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) language or slurs; intervene, when I feel I can, in situations where others are using anti-LGBT language or harassing other students and actively support safer schools efforts."
The school has acknowledged that the exercise was not appropriate for kindergartners.
Parent Adela Voelker, who declined to be interviewed in depth for this report, said she was furious when she found her child's signature on one of the cards. She said she contacted a non-profit legal defense organization specializing in parents' rights.
Meanwhile, a school board member, Jeff Cook, says some type of action should be taken.
"We have a general rule that all instruction should be age appropriate, and this clearly was not," said Cook, who has served on the school board for five years.
SOURCE: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445865,00.html
The Communist Subversion of America's Kids!
That's just sick! Have they no shame at GLSEN? Can you imagine, trying to teach Ronald that it's ok to stick something in Timmy's backside? ...or that it's ok for a boy to become a girl? What has American society deteriorated to? It is tragic. Any honest child knows that God created Adam and Eve; not Adam and Steve. GLSEN are a bunch of sickos!
Young girls today, they want to have fun. Young girls today just wanna party. Today young girls wanna go to a nightclub and have open sex on the floor of the nightclub, and then put it on YouTube, and if they should get pregnant they want to throw the baby into a dumpster. That's the new America! No morals. No self-respect. No nation. No borders. No language. No culture. No responsibility. Now that's America today!
Barack Obama is Bad News! Homosexuality will flourish under Obama's immorally bankrupt administration over the next 4-to-8 years. I am convinced that new anti-hate speech laws will be passed nationwide, and Christians will be persecuted woefully under Obama's administration. Such laws have already been passed in Colorado outlawing Biblical preaching by businesses against homosexuality.
This is Communism and a total violation of one's First Amendment right to free speech. The Bill of Rights does NOT grant rights to homosexuals, abortionists, witches and other immoral groups who do evil. Genuine freedom can only be established and maintained by unwavering faith in God.
Barack Obama is an alias. His real name is Barry Sottero, purportedly born in Kenya and became a citizen of Indonesia.
Listen to what the new elected Vice president, Joe Biden, had to say about the NEW WORLD ORDER...
“This is a new Democratic Party not the party of the 70s and 80s. This is a party that has adjusted to the realities of a new world order.”
SOURCE: WSLS TV interview of Democratic Vice Presidential nominee, Joe Biden
The New World Order [NWO] is here and its climax will be the reign of the Antichrist. It's amazing how many people label you as a "conspiracy nut" when you mention the NWO, while our leaders openly mention it in public. Here's some NWO Quotes. I firmly believe that the return of the Lord Jesus Christ (the Rapture) is imminent. We are living in dark times and apostasy is going to increase exponentially. Mockers and naysayers already encompass us about in society. Sickos, New Agers and sex-perverts are everywhere, especially teaching in America's public schools. Satan is working relentlessly to kill, steal and destroy America's youth (John 10:10).
It is a sad day in America when a known Communist is elected to be president. Only God knows the evil that will be unleashed during the next 4-to-8 years of the Obama Administration. Sin will flourish unprecedented in the United States. Homosexuals will receive more rights. Christ-honoring, Bible-believing, sin-hating, soulwinning Christians will be increasingly persecuted in America. Guns will be harder and harder to purchase, own and license. Abortion rights will increase. Immorality, divorce, pornography, feminism and other evils will wax worse and worse. Our laws will be changed to cater to the ungodly.
America has once again been given the president it deserves... a Marxist Communist! Barack Obama is a wolf in sheep's clothing, who's being idolized by the newsmedia as if he's a god. This is all deliberate propaganda to sell the American people on Socialism and Anti-American agendas, which will be the ultimate undoing of our once great nation. Although I respect the office of U.S. President, as a Christian believer it is my Biblical duty, and yours if you love the Lord, to defend the Christian faith. This means taking a Biblical stand against the evils of Socialism and Communism, which reward the lazy and punish the diligent! Capitalism works just fine in an HONEST system.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but morally treasonable to the American public.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama: America's Enemy
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:15:25 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him
as "Marxist" and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us.
That program isn't in place as yet and, any income-to-premium ratios
have not been implemented.
I know, and already rates are rising and MEDICARE coverage is
diminished.
Yet, this does not tie a program which has not yet been implemented to those
factors.
Post by unknown
Hey, dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the
campaign that we need to redistribute wealth?
Hey, shithead, the capitalist system redistributes wealth during the
process of buying and selling, (not in a Marxist manner of merely
taking from the 'rich' and giving to the 'poor').
Hey, welfare cunt, redistribution is the heart of socialism; the
system that thwarts achievement and growth.
Hey, uncomprehending dipshit, "redistribution" is not exclusively defined as
a socialist process. To reiterate this and dumb it down for you; the
process of buying and selling 'redistributes' wealth. That process
contributes to fiscal growth, rather than thwarting it.
Post by unknown
But you folks on the "gimme end" don't give a shit about that.
I never proposed being at the "gimme end" of your sophist argument.
zayton
2010-11-06 23:56:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:54:05 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Bush wasted money like a democrat but the anti-American, Marxist,
race-baiting, pro-share-the-wealth thug who replaced him makes
Bush look like Scrooge.
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him as
"Marxist" and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us.
Evidence please?
You clearly didn't follow any of the legislative debate and have no idea
what the plan actually does.

Hey,
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the campaign
that we need to redistribute wealth?
Nope.
And neither did you.
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
You moonbats really DO live in another world.
The real one?
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 01:47:27 UTC
Permalink
The Long-Deserved Death Of Keynesian Economics
by Dave Price on August 9, 2010

in Politics

Tim Cavanaugh has a devastating cite from just-retired Obama economic
adviser Christina Romer:

The generally precise Romer spells out the difference for us: Using
this approach, the estimated multiplier for monetary policy is 0.823
and the estimated multiplier for fiscal policy is -0.233.

You don’t say. Gee, that would have been nice to know a few trillion
dollars ago.

Democrat Party water-carriers like Paul Krugman love Keynesian
economics, with its assumed large fiscal multiplier, because it meshes
so perfectly with leftism’s general preferences: more government,
bigger government, more public-sector employees, higher pay for those
employees — and, naturally, higher taxes to go with all that. Their
continued insistence we need to spend (and tax!) more, more, more even
as unemployment goes higher and deficits mushroomm is growing ever
less credible with each additional “unexpected” signal of economic
failure.

If there’s one positive to come out of the Great Recession, it should
be the end of Keynesian economics as a serious policy choice. The
notion you can grow the economy via North Korea-style command
economics should have been long-dead even before Romer’s 1992 paper,
but Obama’s miserable failure may finally drive a stake through this
productivity-sucking, economy-killing meme.

Let me put this simply — and contradict a too-widely-held assumption
of macroeconomics:

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AGGREGATE DEMAND.

Government spending is not demand, it is command spending. To
“aggregate” it with private sector demand is like counting your dog’s
ringworm as a “pet” on a census form, at least for purposes of
stimulating the economy. It does not follow the same rules as private
sector spending, as it is always seized and distributed according to
law/fiat by bureaucrats indifferent to costs and benefits, not
exchanged consensually between self-interested private parties seeking
to maximize their utility. That’s why Keynesianism is “unexpectedly”
falling flat on its face before our eyes: it relies on a fallacious
aggregation.

(Now, generally about this time someone on the left perks up and says
“But… roads!” Yes, we need roads (but tend to also get Bridges To
Nowhere), just as we need regulation, laws, etc. My point is not that
all government spending is wasteful, just that government is 1) not
very good at allocating resources to what is actually useful versus
wasteful/cronyist/populist, and 2) is spending far more than it
should, esp. given #1. Optimal government spending levels (i.e. those
associated with highest levels of economic growth) appear to be
something between 20% and 30% of GDP, whereas in the U.S. those levels
are now exceeding 40%.)
________________





Keynesian View of Economics
What is the Keynesian view of economics? It is a disaster, is what it
is. It is really not at all difficult for any thinking person to
understand why Keynesian economics doesn't work. So, why do so many
people so foolishly believe in it? We have to delve deeper into this
matter to understand this crisis in brain power.

John Maynard Keynes was an overbearingly arrogant man who was part of
the Bloomsbury Group--the group that led the British pacifist movement
which largely led to World War II by placating the Nazis whenever they
did anything wrong (until the War). He was delusionally in love with
the government, and felt that it was the embodiment of a higher moral
authority and that it had the power to centrally plan billions of
private daily activities in a clean, efficient, rational, noble way.
Keynes was the man who put forth the irrational idea of government
"stimulus" of the economy--which is precisely why Emperor Dumbo uses
this terminology.

Today's Progressive Democrats are driven by their fetish with
Keynesian view of economics--so, understanding their politics means
Keynes' ideas need to be analyzed. No objective analysis of his ideas
or what they have done in practice comes out at all good for those
views or the mad Libs. This means these ideas are bad for the health
of our nation. But, since Keynesian economics places government at the
core of everything, those in power (who are not authentic Republicans)
really don't care.

Why Keynesian Economics Doesn't WorkEvery inch and ounce of theory and
practical, historical data regarding the Keynesian view of economics
proves the following points.

•If the government puts money into the economy, it absolutely has to
have taken it out of the economy. If the government has taken money
out of the economy, it has harmed the economy, for it has removed
money from the productive part of the economy, undermining the ability
of the private sector to create new productive jobs and raise wages
for existing jobs. This is expressed in a favorite economic conundrum
of the government hiring people to dig a trench from New York City
down to Miami, Florida using teaspoons.
•Harvard Professor Greg Mankiw has calculated that under the
Obama/Democrat "stimulus plan", each and every new job (if they even
are created in the first place) will cost $280,000. Most of the jobs
that would be created certainly would not be worth salaries even close
to $280,000 to employers--and the people who get those jobs will not
be paid nearly that much money. Thus, an economic stimulus package run
by the government is an absurd inefficiency.
•The Keynesian view of economics is that government intervention in
the economy is necessary to overcome down-turning business cycles.
This fails to take into account the real-world experiences of history
that it is government that causes down-turning business cycles. The
government does this by imposing higher taxes, more entitlement
spending, trade barrier tariffs, increased regulations, and more
ominous fears.
•The Keynesian view of economics essentially means that the government
picks winners and losers. The winners that it picks are inevitably
welfare recipients (because they are totally under the government's
thumb), special interest groups who pad Uncle Sam's pockets, companies
who need to be "bailed out", Big Labor unions, and those who seek to
benefit from increasing the government dole of entitlement spending.
The losers are inevitably wealthy and high income individuals (because
they have too much independence), small business owners who get
classified as "rich", firms who try to engage in fair trade, our
children and grandchildren who get saddled with greater debts, and
every consumer who must now pay higher prices for all goods and
services.
•The Keynesian view of economics was what was followed all throughout
the Great Depression and throughout the economic malaise of the 1970s,
and it is what has been increasingly more followed since 2006. People,
it just doesn't work.
•Since this view of economics makes the government into a Godhead, it
creates a condition of counterfeit nurturance. In essence, this means
that people become ever more dependent on the government, which kills
their spirit. Those who somehow find the way of being financially
independent from the government are persecuted by taxation, litigation
threats, and mainstream media attacks.
As the Heritage Institute's Brian Reidl has written, “Government
cannot create new purchasing power out of thin air. If Congress funds
new spending with taxes, it is simply redistributing existing income.
If Congress instead borrows the money from domestic investors, those
investors will have that much less to invest or to spend in the
private economy. If Congress borrows the money from foreigners, the
balance of payments will adjust by equally reducing net exports,
leaving GDP unchanged. Every dollar Congress spends must first come
from somewhere else...Government spending often alters the consumption
of total demand, such as increasing consumption at the expense of
investment.”
Post by zayton
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:54:05 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
Bush wasted money like a democrat but the anti-American, Marxist,
race-baiting, pro-share-the-wealth thug who replaced him makes
Bush look like Scrooge.
Which decisions and policies of Obama have you designating him as
"Marxist" and "pro-share-the-wealth thug"?
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us.
Evidence please?
You clearly didn't follow any of the legislative debate and have no idea
what the plan actually does.
Hey,
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the campaign
that we need to redistribute wealth?
Nope.
And neither did you.
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
You moonbats really DO live in another world.
The real one?
whistler
2010-11-07 02:45:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us.  Hey,
dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the campaign
that we need to redistribute wealth?
You moonbats really DO live in another world.
The wealth already GOT re-ditributed when the table tilted towards the
RICH, now that they have nearly all of it, it's time to RE-re-
distribute downwards, but that procedure hasn't even yet begun.
Haven't you got some shoes to lick, Little-Woody (Armey of Dicks - aka
Slave-werks) say maybe Michelle BatShit Bachman's.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 03:36:53 UTC
Permalink
That's right, moonbat, kill all the rich and seize their wealth.

It'll run Obammy;s Utopia about 3 months.

















On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:45:19 -0700 (PDT), whistler
Post by whistler
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
ObamaCare for one which will cover ne'er-do-wells who have not
contributed to any premiums, at the expense of the rest of us. =A0Hey,
dumbass, didn't you hear him tell Joe The Plumber during the campaign
that we need to redistribute wealth?
You moonbats really DO live in another world.
The wealth already GOT re-ditributed when the table tilted towards the
RICH, now that they have nearly all of it, it's time to RE-re-
distribute downwards, but that procedure hasn't even yet begun.
Haven't you got some shoes to lick, Little-Woody (Armey of Dicks - aka
Slave-werks) say maybe Michelle BatShit Bachman's.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-06 22:57:44 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:45:55 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear that
dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an economic
depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
Apparently you do, if you're a disingenuous republican attempting to heap
republican additions to the deficit onto an administration that inherited
them.
President Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed that his budget would
cut the deficit by half by the end of his term. But as Heritage
analyst Brian Riedl has pointed out, given that Obama has already
helped quadruple the deficit with his stimulus package, pledging to
halve it by 2013 is hardly ambitious. The Washington Post has a great
graphic which helps put President Obama’s budget deficits in context
of President Bush’s.

What’s driving Obama’s unprecedented massive deficits? Spending. Riedl
details:

•President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion
through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
•President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts.
President Obama is accelerating that course.
•President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an
estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has
proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care
fund.
•President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster
than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.
•President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP
on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already
in­creased this spending by 20 percent.
•President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income
taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.

•President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public
debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public
debt), President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt
from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
UPDATE: Many Obama defenders in the comments are claiming that the
numbers above do not include spending on Iraq and Afghanistan during
the Bush years. They most certainly do. While Bush did fund the wars
through emergency supplementals (not the regular budget process), that
spending did not simply vanish. It is included in the numbers above.
Also, some Obama defenders are claiming the graphic above represents
biased Heritage Foundation numbers. While we stand behind the numbers
we put out 100%, the numbers, and the graphic itself, above are from
the Washington Post. We originally left out the link to WaPo. It has
now been added.

CLARIFICATION: Of course, this Washington Post graphic does not
perfectly delineate budget surpluses and deficits by administration.
President Bush took office in January 2001, and therefore played a
lead role in crafting the FY 2002-2008 budgets. Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for the FY 2009 budget deficit that
overlaps their administrations, before President Obama assumes full
budgetary responsibility beginning in FY 2010. Overall, President
Obama’s budget would add twice as much debt as President Bush over the
same number of years.
unknown
2010-11-06 22:59:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by unknown
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear that
dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an economic
depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
Apparently you do, if you're a disingenuous republican attempting to heap
republican additions to the deficit onto an administration that inherited
them.
President Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed that his budget would
cut the deficit by half by the end of his term. But as Heritage
analyst Brian Riedl has pointed out, given that Obama has already
helped quadruple the deficit with his stimulus package, pledging to
halve it by 2013 is hardly ambitious. The Washington Post has a great
graphic which helps put President Obama's budget deficits in context
of President Bush's.
What's driving Obama's unprecedented massive deficits? Spending. Riedl
.President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion
through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
.President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts.
President Obama is accelerating that course.
.President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an
estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has
proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care
fund.
.President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster
than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.
.President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP
on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already
in­creased this spending by 20 percent.
.President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income
taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.
.President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public
debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public
debt), President Obama's budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt
from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
UPDATE: Many Obama defenders in the comments are claiming that the
numbers above do not include spending on Iraq and Afghanistan during
the Bush years. They most certainly do. While Bush did fund the wars
through emergency supplementals (not the regular budget process), that
spending did not simply vanish. It is included in the numbers above.
Also, some Obama defenders are claiming the graphic above represents
biased Heritage Foundation numbers. While we stand behind the numbers
we put out 100%, the numbers, and the graphic itself, above are from
the Washington Post. We originally left out the link to WaPo. It has
now been added.
CLARIFICATION: Of course, this Washington Post graphic does not
perfectly delineate budget surpluses and deficits by administration.
President Bush took office in January 2001, and therefore played a
lead role in crafting the FY 2002-2008 budgets. Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for the FY 2009 budget deficit that
overlaps their administrations, before President Obama assumes full
budgetary responsibility beginning in FY 2010. Overall, President
Obama's budget would add twice as much debt as President Bush over the
same number of years.
Subtracting the inherited portion of the deficit, Obama's administration
would preside over about the same amount of public debt that the previous
administration presided over, (of course, we still have two more years to
either add to it or, decrease it and blame Obama for the excesses of
Congress).
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 01:47:31 UTC
Permalink
U.S. President Barack Obama and his administration weakened the
country’s economy by seeking to foster growth instead of paying down
the federal debt, said Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of “The Black
Swan.”

“Obama did exactly the opposite of what should have been done,” Taleb
said yesterday in Montreal in a speech as part of Canada’s Salon
Speakers series. “He surrounded himself with people who exacerbated
the problem. You have a person who has cancer and instead of removing
the cancer, you give him tranquilizers. When you give tranquilizers to
a cancer patient, they feel better but the cancer gets worse.”

Today, Taleb said, “total debt is higher than it was in 2008 and
unemployment is worse.”

Obama this month proposed a package of $180 billion in business tax
breaks and infrastructure outlays to boost spending and job growth.
That would come on top of the $814 billion stimulus measure enacted
last year. The U.S. government’s total outstanding debt is about $13.5
trillion, according to Treasury figures.

Obama, 49, inherited what the National Bureau of Economic Research
said this week was the deepest U.S. recession since the Great
Depression. Even after the stimulus measure and other government
actions, the U.S. unemployment rate is 9.6 percent.

Governments globally need to cut debt and avoid bailing out struggling
companies because that’s the only way they can shield their economies
from the negative consequences of erroneous budget forecasts, Taleb
said.

Errant Forecasts

“Today there is a dependency on people who have never been able to
forecast anything,” Taleb said. “What kind of system is insulated from
forecasting errors? A system where debts are low and companies are
allowed to die young when they are fragile. Companies always end up
dying one day anyway.”

Taleb, a native of Lebanon who gave his speech in French to an
audience of Quebec business people, said Canada’s fiscal situation
makes the country a safer investment than its southern neighbor.

Canada has the lowest ratio of net debt to gross domestic product
among the Group of Seven industrialized countries and will keep that
distinction until at least 2014, the country’s finance department said
in March. Canada’s ratio, 24 percent in 2007, will rise to about 30
percent by 2014. The U.S. ratio, now above 40 percent, will top 80
percent in four years, the department said, citing IMF data.

“I am bullish on Canada,” he told the audience. “I prefer Canada to
the U.S. or even Europe.”

Mortgage Interest

Canada’s economy also benefits from the fact that homeowners, unlike
their U.S. neighbors, can’t take mortgage interest as a tax deduction,
Taleb said. That removes the incentive to take on too much debt, he
said.

“The first thing to do if you want to solve the mortgage problem in
the U.S. is to stop making these interest payments deductible,” he
said. “Has someone dared to talk about this in Washington? No, because
the U.S. homebuilders’ lobby is hyperactive and doesn’t want people to
talk about this.”

Taleb also criticized banks and securities firms, saying they don’t
adequately warn clients of the risks they run when they invest their
retirement savings on the stock market.

‘Have Fun’

“People should use financial markets to have fun, but not as a
depository of value,” Taleb said. “Investors have been deceived.
People were told that markets go up regularly, but if you look at the
last 10 years that’s not been the case. The risks are always greater
than what people are told.”

Asked by an audience member if returns such as those posted by
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffett -- who
amassed the world’s third-biggest personal fortune through decades of
stock picks and takeovers -- are the product of luck or talent, Taleb
said both played a part.

If given a choice between investing with Buffett and billionaire
investor George Soros, Taleb also said he would probably pick the
latter.

“I am not saying Buffett isn’t as good as Soros,” he said. “I am
saying that the probability Soros’s returns come from randomness is
much smaller because he did almost everything: he bought currencies,
he sold currencies, he did arbitrages. He made a lot more decisions.
Buffett followed a strategy to buy companies that had a certain
earnings profile, and it worked for him. There is a lot more luck
involved in this strategy.”

Soros gained fame in the 1990s when he reportedly made $1 billion
correctly betting against the British pound.

Taleb’s 2007 best-seller, “The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly
Improbable,” argues that history is littered with rare, high-impact
events. The black-swan theory stems from the ancient misconception
that all swans were white.

A former trader, Taleb teaches risk engineering at New York University
and advises Universa Investments LP, a Santa Monica, California-based
fund that bets on extreme market moves.

















On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:59:46 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
Post by unknown
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course the $3
trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and it's clear that
dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even during an economic
depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new ridiculous
lies.
Apparently you do, if you're a disingenuous republican attempting to heap
republican additions to the deficit onto an administration that inherited
them.
President Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed that his budget would
cut the deficit by half by the end of his term. But as Heritage
analyst Brian Riedl has pointed out, given that Obama has already
helped quadruple the deficit with his stimulus package, pledging to
halve it by 2013 is hardly ambitious. The Washington Post has a great
graphic which helps put President Obama's budget deficits in context
of President Bush's.
What's driving Obama's unprecedented massive deficits? Spending. Riedl
.President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion
through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
.President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts.
President Obama is accelerating that course.
.President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an
estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has
proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care
fund.
.President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster
than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.
.President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP
on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already
in­creased this spending by 20 percent.
.President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income
taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.
.President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public
debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public
debt), President Obama's budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt
from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
UPDATE: Many Obama defenders in the comments are claiming that the
numbers above do not include spending on Iraq and Afghanistan during
the Bush years. They most certainly do. While Bush did fund the wars
through emergency supplementals (not the regular budget process), that
spending did not simply vanish. It is included in the numbers above.
Also, some Obama defenders are claiming the graphic above represents
biased Heritage Foundation numbers. While we stand behind the numbers
we put out 100%, the numbers, and the graphic itself, above are from
the Washington Post. We originally left out the link to WaPo. It has
now been added.
CLARIFICATION: Of course, this Washington Post graphic does not
perfectly delineate budget surpluses and deficits by administration.
President Bush took office in January 2001, and therefore played a
lead role in crafting the FY 2002-2008 budgets. Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for the FY 2009 budget deficit that
overlaps their administrations, before President Obama assumes full
budgetary responsibility beginning in FY 2010. Overall, President
Obama's budget would add twice as much debt as President Bush over the
same number of years.
Subtracting the inherited portion of the deficit, Obama's administration
would preside over about the same amount of public debt that the previous
administration presided over, (of course, we still have two more years to
either add to it or, decrease it and blame Obama for the excesses of
Congress).
zayton
2010-11-07 02:23:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
U.S. President Barack Obama and his administration weakened the
country's economy by seeking to foster growth instead of paying down
the federal debt, said Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of "The Black
Swan."
Bullshit!

The economy was collapsing in on itself when Obama took office, as a result
of the very same policies idiots like this are pushing now.

We would be in a state of martial law now, with whole banking empires
falling like dominos, and virtually every major investment group in
bankruptcy if the collapse had not been halted by the stimulus packages.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 03:36:46 UTC
Permalink
Why the Stimulus Failed
Fiscal policy cannot exnihilate new demand

BRIAN RIEDL

Conservatives have correctly declared President Obama’s $787 billion
“stimulus” a flop. In a January report, White House economists
predicted the bill would create (not merely save) 3.3 million jobs.
Since then, 2.8 million jobs have been lost, pushing unemployment
toward 10 percent.

Yet few have explained correctly why the stimulus failed. By blaming
the slow pace of stimulus spending (even though it’s ahead of
schedule), many conservatives have accepted the premise that
government spending stimulates the economy. Their thinking implies
that we should have spent much more by now.

History proves otherwise. In 1939, after a doubling of federal
spending failed to relieve the Great Depression, Treasury Secretary
Henry Morgenthau said that “we have tried spending money. We are
spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. . .
. After eight years of this administration we have just as much
unemployment as when we started . . . and an enormous debt to boot!”
Japan made the same mistake in the 1990s (building the largest
government debt in the industrial world), and the United States is
making it today.

This repeated failure has nothing to do with the pace or type of
spending. Rather, the problem is found in the oft-repeated Keynesian
myth that deficit spending “injects new dollars into the economy,”
thereby increasing demand and spurring economic growth. According to
this theory, government spending adds money to the economy, taxes
remove money, and the budget deficit represents net new dollars
injected. Therefore, it scarcely matters how the dollars are spent.
John Maynard Keynes famously asserted that a government program paying
people to dig and then refill ditches would provide new income for
those workers to spend and circulate through the economy, creating
even more jobs and income. Today, lawmakers cling to estimates by Mark
Zandi of Economy.com that on average, $1 in new deficit spending
expands the economy by roughly $1.50.

If that were true, the record $1.6 trillion in deficit spending over
the past fiscal year would have already overheated the economy. Yet
despite this spending, which is equal to fully 9 percent of GDP, the
economy is expected to shrink by at least 3 percent this fiscal year.
If the spending constitutes an injection of “new money” into the
economy, we may conclude that, without it, the economy would contract
12 percent — hardly a plausible claim.

If $1.6 trillion in deficit spending failed to slow the economy’s
slide, there’s no reason to believe that adding $185 billion — the
2009 portion of the stimulus bill — will suddenly do the trick. But if
budget deficits of nearly $2 trillion are insufficient stimulus, how
much would be enough? $3 trillion? $4 trillion?

This is no longer a theoretical exercise. The idea that increased
deficit spending can cure recessions has been tested, and it has
failed. If growing the economy were as simple as expanding government
spending and deficits, then Italy, France, and Germany would be the
global economic kings. And there would be no reason to stop at $787
billion: Congress could guarantee unlimited prosperity by endlessly
borrowing and spending trillions of dollars.

The simple reason government spending fails to end recessions is that
Congress does not have a vault of money waiting to be distributed.
Every dollar Congress “injects” into the economy must first be taxed
or borrowed out of the economy. No new income, and therefore no new
demand, is created. They are merely redistributed from one group of
people to another. Congress cannot create new purchasing power out of
thin air.

This is intuitively clear in the case of funding new spending with new
taxes. Yet funding new spending with new borrowing is also pure
redistribution, since the investors who lend Washington the money will
have that much less to invest in the economy. The fact that borrowed
funds (unlike taxes) must later be repaid by the government makes them
no less of a zero-sum transfer today.

Even during recessions — when total production falls, leaving people
with less income to spend — Congress cannot create new demand and
income. Any government spending that increases production at factories
and puts unemployed individuals to work will be financed by removing
funds (and thus idling resources) elsewhere in the economy. This is
true whether the unemployment rate is 5 percent or 50 percent.

For example, many lawmakers claim that every $1 billion in highway
stimulus will create 47,576 new construction jobs. But Congress must
first borrow that $1 billion out of the private economy, which will
then lose a roughly equivalent number of jobs. As
transportation-policy expert Ronald Utt has explained, “the only way
that $1 billion of new highway spending can create 47,576 new jobs is
if the $1 billion appears out of nowhere as if it were manna from
heaven.” Removing water from one end of a swimming pool and dumping it
in the other end will not raise the overall water level. Similarly,
moving dollars from one part of the economy to the other will not
expand the economy. Not even in the short run.

Consider a simpler example. Under normal circumstances, a family might
put its $1,000 savings in a certificate of deposit at the local bank.
The bank would then lend that $1,000 to the local hardware store. This
would have the effect of recycling that spending around the town,
supporting local jobs. Now suppose that, induced by an offer of higher
interest rates, the family instead buys a $1,000 government bond that
funds the stimulus bill. Washington spends that $1,000 in a different
town, creating jobs there instead. The stimulus bill has changed only
the location of the spending.

The mistaken view of fiscal stimulus persists because we can easily
see the people put to work with government funds. We don’t see the
jobs that would have been created elsewhere in the economy with those
same dollars had they not been lent to Washington.

In his 1848 essay “What Is Seen and What Is Not Seen,” French
economist Frédéric Bastiat termed this the “broken window” fallacy, in
reference to a local myth that breaking windows would stimulate the
economy by creating window-repair jobs. Today, the broken-window
fallacy explains why thousands of new stimulus jobs are not improving
the total employment picture.

Keynesian economists counter that redistribution can increase demand
if the money is transferred from savers to spenders. Yet this “idle
savings” theory assumes that savings fall out of the economy, which
clearly is not the case. Nearly all individuals and businesses invest
their savings or put it in banks (which in turn invest it or lend it
out) — so the money is still being spent somewhere in the economy.
Even in this recession, with tightened lending standards, banks are
performing their traditional role of intermediating between those who
have savings and those who need to borrow. They are not building
extensive basement vaults to hoard cash.

Since the financial system transfers savings into investment spending,
the only savings that drop out of the economy are those dollars
literally hoarded in mattresses and safes — and there is no evidence
that this is occurring en masse. And even if individuals, businesses,
and banks did distrust the financial system enough to hoard their
dollars, why would they suddenly lend them to the government to
finance a stimulus bill?

Once the idle-savings theory collapses, so does all the intellectual
support for government spending as stimulus. If there are no idle
savings to acquire, then the government is merely borrowing purchasing
power from one part of the economy and moving it into another part of
the economy. Washington becomes nothing more than a pricey middleman,
redistributing existing demand.

Even foreign borrowing is no free lunch. Before China can lend us
dollars, it must acquire them from us. This requires either attracting
American investment or raising the Chinese trade surplus (and the
American trade deficit). The balance of payments between America and
other nations must eventually net out to zero, which means government
spending funded from foreign borrowing is zero-sum.

I’ve purposely ignored the Federal Reserve, which actually can inject
cash into the economy, but not in a way that constitutes stimulus.
Congress can deficit-spend; Treasury can finance the deficit spending
by issuing bonds; and the Federal Reserve can buy those bonds by
printing money. Any economic boost is then due to the Federal
Reserve’s actions, not the deficit spending — and of course the
Federal Reserve will have to raise interest rates, slowing the economy
again, to bring the resulting inflation under control.

If government spending doesn’t cause economic growth, what does?
Growth happens when more goods and services are produced, and the only
true source of this is an expanding labor force combined with high
productivity. High productivity in turn requires educated and
motivated workers, advanced technology, adequate infrastructure,
physical capital such as factories and tools, and the rule of law.

Government spending could boost long-run productivity through
investments in education and infrastructure — but only if politicians
could target those investments better than the private sector would.
And it turns out that politicians cannot outsmart the marketplace.
Mountains of academic studies show that government spending generally
reduces long-term productivity.

Furthermore, most government programs that could increase productivity
don’t work fast enough to counteract a recession. Education spending
cannot raise productivity until its student beneficiaries graduate and
enter the work force. It can take more than a decade to build new
highways and bridges.

The only policy proven to increase productivity in the short term is
to lower tax rates and reduce regulation. Businesses can grow only
through consistent investment and an expanding, skilled workforce.
Cutting marginal tax rates promotes these conditions, by creating
incentives to work, save, and invest.

It’s happened before. In 1981, President Reagan inherited an economy
stagnating under the weight of 70 percent marginal income-tax rates.
Under Reagan, the top rate fell to 28 percent, and the subsequent
surge in investment and labor supply created the strongest 25-year
economic boom in American history.

Such tax-rate reductions are superior to tax rebates designed to “put
money in people’s pockets.” Rebates — like government spending —
simply redistribute existing dollars. They don’t increase productivity
because they don’t change incentives: No one has to work, save, or
invest more to get a tax rebate. The 2001 and 2008 rebates failed
because Congress borrowed money from investors and foreigners and
redistributed it to families. Not surprisingly, any new
personal-consumption spending was matched by corresponding declines in
investment spending and net exports, and the economy remained
stagnant.

If conservatives wish to provide economic leadership, they must get
this argument right. The stimulus is not failing because it is too
small or because too much of it is being saved. It’s failing because
Congress can only redistribute existing demand, not create new demand.
This recession will eventually end. The more serious, long-term danger
is that President Obama’s Europeanization of the economy will bring
the same slow growth, stagnant wages, job losses, high taxes, and lack
of competitiveness that have plagued Western Europe, leaving the
United States at an ever-growing disadvantage with Asian countries not
so afflicted.

To prevent this, conservatives and free marketeers will need to
promote policies that support long-term prosperity. The first step
will be articulating why big government does not bring economic
growth.
Post by zayton
Post by Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
U.S. President Barack Obama and his administration weakened the
country's economy by seeking to foster growth instead of paying down
the federal debt, said Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of "The Black
Swan."
Bullshit!
The economy was collapsing in on itself when Obama took office, as a result
of the very same policies idiots like this are pushing now.
We would be in a state of martial law now, with whole banking empires
falling like dominos, and virtually every major investment group in
bankruptcy if the collapse had not been halted by the stimulus packages.
zayton
2010-11-06 23:58:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:45:55 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course
the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and
it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even
during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
Apparently you do, if you're a disingenuous republican attempting to
heap republican additions to the deficit onto an administration that
inherited them.
President Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed that his budget would
cut the deficit by half by the end of his term. But as Heritage
analyst Brian Riedl has pointed out, given that Obama has already
helped quadruple the deficit with his stimulus package, pledging to
halve it by 2013 is hardly ambitious. The Washington Post has a great
graphic which helps put President Obama's budget deficits in context
of President Bush's.
What's driving Obama's unprecedented massive deficits? Spending. Riedl
.President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion
through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
.President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts.
President Obama is accelerating that course.
.President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an
estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has
proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care
fund.
.President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster
than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.
.President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP
on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already
in­creased this spending by 20 percent.
.President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income
taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.
.President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public
debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public
debt), President Obama's budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt
from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
UPDATE: Many Obama defenders in the comments are claiming that the
numbers above do not include spending on Iraq and Afghanistan during
the Bush years. They most certainly do. While Bush did fund the wars
through emergency supplementals (not the regular budget process), that
spending did not simply vanish. It is included in the numbers above.
Also, some Obama defenders are claiming the graphic above represents
biased Heritage Foundation numbers. While we stand behind the numbers
we put out 100%, the numbers, and the graphic itself, above are from
the Washington Post. We originally left out the link to WaPo. It has
now been added.
CLARIFICATION: Of course, this Washington Post graphic does not
perfectly delineate budget surpluses and deficits by administration.
President Bush took office in January 2001, and therefore played a
lead role in crafting the FY 2002-2008 budgets. Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for the FY 2009 budget deficit that
overlaps their administrations, before President Obama assumes full
budgetary responsibility beginning in FY 2010. Overall, President
Obama's budget would add twice as much debt as President Bush over the
same number of years.
If you only add new expendatures and ignore the cuts.
Figures may ot lie; but liars still figure.
Evil Eric Holder, Black Racist
2010-11-07 01:47:34 UTC
Permalink
The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009
-- it was actually January 3rd 2007..

The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the
first
time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

"For those of you who are listening to the liberals propagating the
fallacy
that everything is "Bush's Fault," think about this:

January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and
the
Congress:

At the time:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%

George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of
JOB
CREATION!

Remember the day.

January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House
Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate
Banking
Committee.

The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part
of the
economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!

THANK YOU DEMOCRATS for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6%
Unemployment to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6
TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae
and
Freddie Mac FIASCOS!

(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting
in
2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy).

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie
Mac?

OBAMA

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?

OBAMA& the Democratic Congress

So when some idiot tries to blame Bush

REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007 THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!

Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the
gas
pedal and steering wheel they were driving.

"It's not that liberals aren't smart, it's just that so much of what
they
know isn't so." -Ronald Reagan
Post by zayton
Post by Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:45:55 -0700, =?iso-8859-1?B?c+JyYGNo4nNt?=
Post by unknown
You add this atrocity to Moochelle Obama's Spain trip and of course
the $3 trillion that her baby daddy has added to the deficit and
it's clear that dem folks really know how to make de eagle fly even
during an economic depression.
You don't defend ridiculous lies you've spouted by spouting new
ridiculous lies.
Apparently you do, if you're a disingenuous republican attempting to
heap republican additions to the deficit onto an administration that
inherited them.
President Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed that his budget would
cut the deficit by half by the end of his term. But as Heritage
analyst Brian Riedl has pointed out, given that Obama has already
helped quadruple the deficit with his stimulus package, pledging to
halve it by 2013 is hardly ambitious. The Washington Post has a great
graphic which helps put President Obama's budget deficits in context
of President Bush's.
What's driving Obama's unprecedented massive deficits? Spending. Riedl
.President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion
through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
.President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts.
President Obama is accelerating that course.
.President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an
estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has
proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care
fund.
.President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster
than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.
.President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP
on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already
in­creased this spending by 20 percent.
.President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income
taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.
.President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public
debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public
debt), President Obama's budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt
from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
UPDATE: Many Obama defenders in the comments are claiming that the
numbers above do not include spending on Iraq and Afghanistan during
the Bush years. They most certainly do. While Bush did fund the wars
through emergency supplementals (not the regular budget process), that
spending did not simply vanish. It is included in the numbers above.
Also, some Obama defenders are claiming the graphic above represents
biased Heritage Foundation numbers. While we stand behind the numbers
we put out 100%, the numbers, and the graphic itself, above are from
the Washington Post. We originally left out the link to WaPo. It has
now been added.
CLARIFICATION: Of course, this Washington Post graphic does not
perfectly delineate budget surpluses and deficits by administration.
President Bush took office in January 2001, and therefore played a
lead role in crafting the FY 2002-2008 budgets. Presidents Bush and
Obama share responsibility for the FY 2009 budget deficit that
overlaps their administrations, before President Obama assumes full
budgetary responsibility beginning in FY 2010. Overall, President
Obama's budget would add twice as much debt as President Bush over the
same number of years.
If you only add new expendatures and ignore the cuts.
Figures may ot lie; but liars still figure.
spiritrising
2010-11-06 15:23:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Greenwood is Magic
Just got back home from a long India trip. I was originally going to
Ladakh (generally Tibetan Buddhist area) for a full on hiking and stay
with locals expedition. The weather this year over the Himalayan
mountain barrirer has been unprecidently rainy - turning the area into
a disaster zone, the usually dry mud and rock puddingstone glacial
moraines turning to liquid mud flows and landslides....due to the
climate change induced rain happening there. After hiking around
150Km, I gave up in the end and evacuated back over the mountains to
Manali in Himalchal Pradesh state. I then went on a slightly aimless
bumming round India trip for 2.5 months or so...after I got through a
oz of Manala cream hashish infused with opium I think (that was an
accident)...in Manali...I wouldn't noramly smoke opium.
In many areas in Indian cities you see people lunched on the sidewalk.
Some of these folks are in a very serious state of starvation and pain
and disease, some of them elders that f'ing well deserve respect.
However in 'modern India' a lot of money is being made by some
people...and yet they don't seem to think that helping people in
urgent need is a sound thing for them to do, and sometimes even
dismissing them with a "its their karma". In the immediate situation I
tried to do what I could do...buying  a meal, giving water and money.
This woman, for example was near CST railway station In Bombay
(Mumbai). She was VERY hungry. There are many people like this.
http://www.indiamike.com/india/attachments/15190d1288952639-how-to-de...
...she'd just been given a meal and 500 rupees.
India is quite frankly a loony bin of a place. The Aryans invaded X
years ago (thousands years?), and incorporated indigenous Dravidian/
folk religions into the new order - The Brahamic Hindu caste system
order...with fair skin, the skin colour of the Aryan invaders, being
seen as 'high caste'. The Dravidans with their dark skin were
relegated to 'low caste' by the Aryans. Tribal people were completely
excluded from this racist ritual abuse senario. The position in
society/caste, being touted by the ritual abuse sytem as 'ones karma'
by the Aryan Brahmic priest order, and if you were a good citizen type
thing, you might get reborn next time in a higher cast (with fairer
skin)....I mean isn't that just so f'ing evil! Watch those Aryan's -
very very dodgy. (a sicko senario now worth $1 billion a year in skin
lightening creams). Now many tribals in India are being more or less
summilarily evicted from their lands (that means millions of real
people) in order that the new India can make economic progress....and
many end up homeless and hungry on the streets on Indian cities with
these so called high castes walking by them saying "oh its their karma
that they're starving on the street"!!! The so called high castes in
India get all or most of the advantages and breaks and money. The
Hindu caste system is very much entrenched in India, and very much to
do I think, with the massive corruption in The Indian political and
economic system...the 'high castes' think that they can do whatever
the f'k they want regardless of legal statute etc etc - much like the
old school blightyworld aristocracy.
And these scum ignore dying human beings with a dismissive "its their
karma"
By the way, I did not see the same scenes of horror on the streets of
democratic socialist Kerala state...but over the border in Tamil Nadu,
there were people dying and sick being ignored by individuals and the
state/government.
Please do what you to help the real needy folks like this...just
imagine being in this situation...starving, in pain, no one to help
you...
Bles
Jim
MAKAH TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY!
;)
you could have went up in the mountains and help find that missing
girl.
quarkcherry
2010-11-06 16:47:31 UTC
Permalink
Looks like this idol-worship isn't working out.

The killing fields of Dashain
Utpal Parashar, Hindustan Times
Email Author
Kathmandu, October 11, 2010
First Published: 01:00 IST(11/10/2010)
Last Updated: 01:02 IST(11/10/2010)
Share more...
2 Comments

Email print
Bal Krishna Mainali, a resident of Balkhu in Kathmandu is a happy man
these days. Anyone would be if you happen to hit the jackpot in a
contest. But unlike other winners Mainali has won an unusual prize—a
castrated goat called khasi in Nepali. It's the first prize given to
winners in a daily
contest asking people to answer questions that appear in newspapers
using their mobile phones. The contest offers other prizes like
microwave and iron as well, but the khasi is coveted prize.

Its Dashain time in Nepal and goats, buffaloes meant for sacrifice are
sought after. The fortnight-long festival celebrated by Hindus to
worship ‘tantrik' goddesses and the nine avatars of Durga began on
Friday.

Millions of goats, buffaloes, pigs, ducks and chickens will be
sacrificed in temples and homes for nine days with Maha Ashtami and
Maha Navami—the two most auspicious days witnessing the largest amount
of bloodshed.

Besides animals from within Nepal, thousands of goats and buffaloes
are being brought from Tibet and India. According to reports, 20
truckloads of buffaloes are entering Nepal from Bihar daily.

Nepal has a population of 28.5 million of which 80 pc are Hindus. If
each family offers even one animal for sacrifice during this time the
figure would give animal lovers nightmares for weeks.

"A goat can cost NRs 3,000 to 8,000 and a buffalo anywhere between NRs
15,000 to 25,000. But despite the steep prices, many poor families
borrow money to buy them," says Santosh Khatiwada of Animal Welfare
Network Nepal.

Later that day:
http://news.oneindia.in/2010/10/17/tenkilled-several-injured-in-bihar-templestampede.html
walt tonne
2010-11-06 18:51:46 UTC
Permalink
Fuck those Indian niggers!
whistler
2010-11-06 20:02:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by walt tonne
Fuck those Indian niggers!
Aw.... Armey of Dicks all with little pecker-woodies, ain't dat cute.
Don't Kill Liberals ... Unless You Torture Them First
2010-11-06 20:39:47 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:02:39 -0700 (PDT), whistler
Post by whistler
Post by walt tonne
Fuck those Indian niggers!
Aw.... Armey of Dicks all with little pecker-woodies, ain't dat cute.
A "muh dikk" response straight from de 'hood.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...